Two-alternative incremental cost and effect

Calculates the differences in cost and effect when a new intervention is compared with a relevant alternative.

Signature

Delta_C = C_new - C_comparator; Delta_E = E_new - E_comparator
Inputs
InputsDefinitionUnit
C_newTotal relevant cost of the new interventioncurrency per defined population or person
C_comparatorTotal relevant cost of the comparatorthe same currency and population basis as C_new
E_newExpected outcome for the new interventionthe selected outcome measure
E_comparatorExpected outcome for the comparatorthe same outcome measure as E_new
Output
Delta_CDifference in cost between the new intervention and comparatorcurrency per defined population or person
Delta_EDifference in outcome between the new intervention and comparatorthe selected outcome measure

Function

Incremental comparison function

Maps the costs and effects of two healthcare alternatives to their incremental cost and incremental effect.

Try this function

Implementations

  • Excel

    Calculate incremental results

    Excel subtracts comparator values from new-intervention values using named ranges.

    =NewCost-ComparatorCost; =NewEffect-ComparatorEffect

Assumptions

  • Relevant comparator

    The comparator represents the healthcare choice actually available to the decision-maker.

  • Consistent analytical basis

    Costs and effects for both alternatives use the same perspective, population, time horizon, price basis and discounting approach.

  • Comparable outcome measure

    Effects for both alternatives are expressed using the same outcome definition and unit.

Worked examples

  • Current care compared with a new intervention

    Current care costs £10,000 and produces 4.50 QALYs. The new intervention costs £14,000 and produces 4.80 QALYs. Incremental cost is £4,000 and incremental effect is 0.30 QALYs.

    C_new = 14000; C_comparator = 10000; E_new = 4.80; E_comparator = 4.50; Delta_C = 4000; Delta_E = 0.30

Common errors

  • Using average instead of incremental results

    Comparing separate average costs or outcomes does not show the change produced by choosing one alternative instead of another.

Sources

  • NICE health technology evaluations manual

    National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. NICE technology appraisal and highly specialised technologies guidance: the manual (PMG36). Published 2022; last updated 31 March 2026. Chapter 4 Economic evaluation, table 4.1 (summary of the reference case) and section 4.2.16 (ICERs as expected additional total cost over expected additional QALYs).

    View source →

Canonical Identity

Stable URI · Machine-readable · Resolvable · CC BY 4.0

Two-alternative incremental cost and effect | HealthEconomics.wiki