Conditional least-cost selection

Identifies the alternative with the lowest total relevant cost after the evidence-equivalence condition has been satisfied.

Signature

j* = argmin_(j in J) C_j, conditional on G = 1
Inputs
InputsDefinitionUnit
C_jTotal relevant cost of alternative j under the stated perspective and time horizoncurrency per defined population or person
GIndicator equal to 1 only when reliable evidence establishes that decision-relevant outcomes do not differ meaningfullybinary indicator
Output
j*Feasible alternative with the lowest total relevant cost when G equals 1alternative identifier
  • J Set of feasible healthcare alternatives included in the comparison (set of alternatives)

Function

Equivalence-gated least-cost selection function

Selects the lowest-cost feasible healthcare alternative only when reliable evidence shows that all decision-relevant outcomes do not differ meaningfully.

Implementations

  • Excel

    Return the least-cost option

    Excel returns the option name associated with the minimum total cost after the equivalence gate is confirmed, and flags a tie when more than one option shares the minimum.

    =IF(EquivalenceGate<>1,"CMA not valid",IF(COUNTIF(TotalCosts,MIN(TotalCosts))>1,"Equal lowest cost",INDEX(OptionNames,MATCH(MIN(TotalCosts),TotalCosts,0))))

Assumptions

  • Equivalence evidence gate satisfied

    Reliable comparative evidence shows that plausible differences in every decision-relevant outcome are too small to change the decision.

  • Complete cost measurement

    Total cost includes every material resource difference permitted by the stated analytical perspective.

  • Consistent costing basis

    Alternatives use the same population, time horizon, currency, price year and applicable discounting convention.

  • Feasible alternatives

    Every alternative in the comparison is available and relevant to the healthcare decision.

Worked examples

  • Selecting the least-cost equivalent option

    Reliable equivalence evidence supports a costs-only comparison. After acquisition, administration, monitoring and adverse-event costs are included, Treatment A costs £1,600 per patient and Treatment B costs £1,520 per patient. Treatment B is selected as the least-cost alternative, saving £80 per patient, although its acquisition price alone is £250 lower. Treatment B is alternative 2 in the calculation.

    C_j = [1600,1520]; G = 1; j* = 2

Common errors

  • Treating no significant difference as equivalence

    Failure to find a statistically significant difference in a superiority test does not establish that outcomes are equivalent and does not justify cost minimisation.

Sources

  • NICE Decision Support Unit report

    Wailoo A, Dixon S. The use of cost minimisation analysis for the appraisal of health technologies. NICE Decision Support Unit; 2019.

    View source →

Canonical Identity

Stable URI · Machine-readable · Resolvable · CC BY 4.0

Conditional least-cost selection | HealthEconomics.wiki