Case fatality rate among resolved cases

Restricts the calculation to detected cases whose outcome is known, dividing deaths by deaths plus recoveries. The WHO scientific brief on estimating mortality from COVID-19 sets it out as a simple response to the delay between becoming a case and dying, but the estimate is still biased when deaths and recoveries happen at different speeds.

Signature

CFR_r = D / (D + R)
Inputs
InputsDefinitionUnit
DDeaths from the disease among detected cases up to the time of estimationcount of people
RRecoveries among detected cases up to the same timecount of people
Output
CFR_rProportion of the resolved cases (those who have died or recovered) who diedproportion with no time unit

Function

Case fatality rate estimation, outbreak bias and population mortality function

Maps counts of deaths, recoveries and cases to the case fatality rate (CFR), the proportion of cases meeting a case definition who die of the disease over a stated period, and relates it to the delay bias of crude estimates during exponential growth and to population mortality through the attack rate. The records follow the notation of the Case Fatality Rate article. Matching the period of a CFR to a model cycle uses HE-FM-TP-003, and the attack rate itself is HE-FM-ATR-001.

Try this function

Implementations

  • Excel

    Resolved-case fatality rate in one cell

    Excel divides the named cell holding deaths by the sum of the named cells holding deaths and recoveries among detected cases.

    =Deaths/(Deaths+Recoveries)

Assumptions

  • Deaths and recoveries resolve at similar speeds

    The estimate is unbiased only if cases that will die and cases that will recover leave the unresolved pool at similar times. If people who die typically do so sooner than others recover, the estimate is too high; if the reverse holds, it is too low.

  • Recoveries recorded as completely as deaths

    Detection of cases, deaths and recoveries stays consistent over the outbreak and recoveries are recorded as fully as deaths. Missing recoveries shrink the denominator and raise the estimate.

Worked examples

  • Resolved-case estimate at week 8 of the illustrative outbreak

    At week 8 the article's illustrative outbreak has 40 deaths and 1,000 recoveries, so 40 / 1,040 gives about 0.0385. It is too high, because deaths occur sooner than recoveries in this outbreak and the final value is 0.030.

    D = 40; R = 1000; CFR_r = 0.0385
  • Resolved-case estimate once every case has resolved

    When all 2,000 cases have resolved, with 60 deaths and 1,940 recoveries, the resolved-case estimate equals the final crude value of 0.030 (computed here for illustration).

    D = 60; R = 1940; CFR_r = 0.03

Common errors

  • Treating the resolved-case estimate as unbiased

    At week 8 the resolved-case estimate of about 0.0385 exceeds the final 0.030 because deaths come sooner than recoveries. In the article's cost-effectiveness example it gives about £8,667 per QALY, below an illustrative threshold of £10,000, against about £11,111 with the final estimate, so a model using it reaches the wrong decision.

Sources

  • WHO resolved-case approach to case fatality during an epidemic

    World Health Organization. Estimating mortality from COVID-19: scientific brief, 4 August 2020. WHO/2019-nCoV/Sci_Brief/Mortality/2020.1. Geneva: WHO; 2020. Section on calculating CFR during an ongoing epidemic: restricting the analysis to resolved cases, and the warning that the estimate is too high if people die quicker than they recover and too low in the reverse case.

    View source →

Canonical Identity

Stable URI · Machine-readable · Resolvable · CC BY 4.0

Case fatality rate among resolved cases | HealthEconomics.wiki