Concept Architecture
Concept
Theoretically, Expected Value of Sample Information (EVSI) is a value of information measure that quantifies the expected benefit of collecting additional imperfect information before making a healthcare decision. It is founded on Bayesian decision theory and estimates the improvement in decision-making that would result from conducting a proposed research study with a specified design and sample size. In health economics, EVSI is used to determine the value of future research and to optimise study design before new evidence is collected.
Mathematically, EVSI is calculated as the difference between the expected net benefit obtained after updating current knowledge with information from a future sample and the maximum expected net benefit based on existing evidence alone. Unlike Expected Value of Perfect Information, EVSI recognises that real studies provide only partial reductions in uncertainty because sample information is incomplete.
In practice, EVSI is estimated using probabilistic sensitivity analysis combined with Bayesian updating, nested Monte Carlo simulation or computational approximation methods. Population EVSI is obtained by multiplying the per-person EVSI by the expected number of patients affected during the decision relevance period. EVSI is routinely used to determine whether proposed research is worthwhile and to optimise trial sample sizes within health technology assessment.
Purpose
Used to quantify the expected value of collecting additional imperfect evidence, supporting research prioritisation, study design and efficient allocation of research resources.
Mathematical Formulae
Primary Formula
EVSI = E[max(E(NMB|Data))] ? max(E(NMB))
where:
NMB = Net Monetary Benefit
Data = future sample information
Supporting Formulae
Net Monetary Benefit:
NMB = ?E ? C
Population EVSI:
Population EVSI = EVSI ? N
where:
N = affected population over the decision relevance period
Relationship:
0 � EVSI � EVPI
Related Mathematical Methods
- Expected Value of Perfect Information
- Expected Value of Partial Perfect Information
- Expected Net Benefit of Sampling
- Bayesian Decision Theory
- Probabilistic Sensitivity Analysis
- Monte Carlo Simulation
- Value of Information Analysis
Example
A proposed clinical trial is expected to reduce uncertainty surrounding treatment effectiveness. The EVSI is estimated as �260 per patient. If the intervention is expected to affect 30,000 patients during the decision relevance period, the population EVSI is:
Population EVSI = �260 ? 30,000 = �7.8 million
If the projected research cost is substantially less than �7.8 million, the proposed study is expected to provide worthwhile information for decision-making.
Excel Implementation
| Function | Example Formula | Health Economics Application |
|---|---|---|
| AVERAGE | =AVERAGE(ResultRange) | Estimate expected net monetary benefit from simulated posterior results. |
| MAX | =MAX(B2:D2) | Identify the optimal decision following simulated sample information. |
| SUMPRODUCT | =EVSI_per_patient*Population | Calculate the population EVSI. |
| IF | =IF(B2>C2,"Research worthwhile","Research not worthwhile") | Compare EVSI with expected research costs during study planning. |
VBA (Optional)
VBA can automate nested Monte Carlo simulations, estimate EVSI for alternative trial designs and compare the value of additional research across candidate sample sizes.
Sources
- Ades AE, Lu G, Claxton K. Expected value of sample information calculations in medical decision modelling. Medical Decision Making. 2004;24(2):207?227.
- Heath A, Manolopoulou I, Baio G. Efficient Monte Carlo estimation of the Expected Value of Sample Information using moment matching. Medical Decision Making. 2018;38(2):163?173.
- Briggs A, Claxton K, Sculpher M. Decision Modelling for Health Economic Evaluation. Oxford University Press.
- ISPOR Value of Information Good Practice Reports.
- NICE. NICE Health Technology Evaluations: The Manual.
Related Concepts (3)
Library
Publications
2
Value of Information Analysis for Research Decisions — An Introduction: Report 1 of the ISPOR Value of Information Analysis Emerging Good Practices Task Force — Fenwick, Steuten, Knies, Ghabri, Basu, Murray, Koffijberg, Strong, Sanders Schmidler & Rothery, Vol. 23, No. 2 ed., 2020 (Value in Health)
The introductory ISPOR good-practice report on value-of-information (VOI) analysis, explaining how VOI quantifies the value of reducing decision uncertainty through further research and where it fits in resource-allocation decisions.
Journal ArticleView source →Value of Information Analytical Methods: Report 2 of the ISPOR Value of Information Analysis Emerging Good Practices Task Force — Rothery, Strong, Koffijberg, Basu, Ghabri, Knies, Murray, Sanders Schmidler, Steuten & Fenwick, Vol. 23, No. 3 ed., 2020 (Value in Health)
The methods companion to the ISPOR VOI series, giving detailed algorithms and software guidance for computing EVPI, EVPPI, EVSI and the expected net benefit of sampling, with recommendations for selecting methods by decision-problem features.
Journal ArticleView source →
Tools & Resources
1
SAVI — Sheffield Accelerated Value of Information — Mark Strong, Jeremy Oakley & Penny Breeze (University of Sheffield), Web application ed., 2024 (University of Sheffield)
A free, open-access web calculator that computes value-of-information measures (EVPI, partial EVPI/EVPPI and EVSI) directly from a model’s probabilistic sensitivity analysis output — no need to re-run the model. Also reports payer strategy-specific and uncertainty burden.
Web Tool (R Shiny)View source →
Frequently Asked Questions (6)
What is EVSI?
The expected benefit of conducting a specific, finite study with a defined sample size and design, only partially resolving existing uncertainty.
Source: Ades, Lu & Claxton 2004
What does EVSI value about a proposed study?
The expected value of sample information estimates the benefit of a specific, realistic study of a given design and size, which would reduce but not remove uncertainty. Unlike the perfect-information measures, which assume all or part of the uncertainty vanishes, it reflects that a finite sample yields imperfect evidence, so its value is lower and depends on the study's design. This makes it the measure closest to a real research decision, since it values the actual study that could be run. It answers what a particular trial is worth. Ades and colleagues (2004) describe it.
Source: Ades et al. 2004
How is EVSI calculated?
EVSI is calculated by considering the possible data a proposed study could produce, updating the current information with each possible dataset, choosing the best option given the updated information, and averaging the resulting outcomes over the possible datasets, then subtracting the expected value under current information. This reflects the improvement in decisions from the study's partial information. Computing EVSI is demanding, historically requiring nested simulation over possible datasets and parameter values, though more efficient regression-based and other methods have been developed to estimate it.
Source: Ades, Lu & Claxton 2004
Why is EVSI useful?
EVSI is useful because it values a specific, realistic study rather than the complete resolution of uncertainty, so it can inform whether a particular study, with its design and sample size, is worth conducting, and, combined with the study's cost, gives the expected net benefit of sampling. Comparing EVSI across designs and sample sizes helps identify efficient research and the optimal sample size. This makes EVSI the value-of-information measure most directly applicable to designing and justifying actual studies, since it reflects the finite information they would provide.
Source: Claxton & Posnett 1996
How does EVSI differ from EVPI and EVPPI?
EVSI values the partial information from a specific finite study, whereas EVPI values resolving all uncertainty and EVPPI values completely resolving a subset of parameters; both EVPI and EVPPI assume perfect information, while EVSI reflects the limited information a real study delivers. EVSI is therefore no greater than the corresponding EVPPI or EVPI, approaching them as the study becomes very large. So EVPI and EVPPI give upper bounds and identify where value lies, while EVSI evaluates concrete study designs, making it the measure for actual research planning.
Source: Ades, Lu & Claxton 2004
What are the limitations of EVSI?
EVSI is computationally demanding, since it requires considering the possible datasets a study could yield and updating the decision for each, historically through nested simulation, though more efficient methods now exist. It depends on the model, the assumed parameter distributions, the proposed study design, and the population and relevance period used to scale it, so errors in these affect it. These limitations mean EVSI is estimated with appropriate methods and its sensitivity to the key assumptions examined, while remaining the value-of-information measure most suited to evaluating specific studies.
Source: Claxton & Posnett 1996
Trust Record
Verified by Dr Darrin Baines
British health economist
Professional identity: darrinbaines.org
Verification date: 31 Oct 2025
Content version: 1.0.0
Canonical Identity
- Persistent URI
- https://healtheconomics.wiki/concept/evsi
- Term code
- HE-EM-VI-011
Stable URI · Machine-readable · Resolvable · CC BY 4.0