VerifiedEvidence: highv1.0.0

Expected Value of Perfect Information

The maximum amount a decision-maker should pay to eliminate all uncertainty surrounding a technology decision, comparing outcomes under perfect versus existing information.

Last reviewedDarrin Baines IP Ltd

Concept Architecture

Concept


Theoretically, Expected Value of Perfect Information (EVPI) is a value of information measure that quantifies the maximum expected benefit of completely eliminating uncertainty before making a healthcare decision. It is founded on Bayesian decision theory and represents the economic value of having perfect knowledge of all uncertain model parameters. In health economics, EVPI is used to determine whether current decision uncertainty is sufficiently important to justify further research.

Mathematically, EVPI is calculated as the difference between the expected value obtained when decisions are made with perfect information and the expected value obtained when decisions are made using current information. It therefore represents the expected opportunity loss associated with making decisions under uncertainty and provides an upper bound on the value of any additional research.

In practice, EVPI is estimated using probabilistic sensitivity analysis by comparing the expected maximum net benefit across all possible parameter values with the maximum expected net benefit based on current evidence. Population EVPI is obtained by multiplying the per-person EVPI by the expected number of patients affected during the decision relevance period and is widely used to prioritise future research in health technology assessment.

Purpose


Used to quantify the maximum economic value of eliminating all decision uncertainty and determine whether additional research may be worthwhile before making healthcare decisions.

Mathematical Formulae

Primary Formula

EVPI = E[max(NMB)] ? max(E[NMB])

where:

NMB = Net Monetary Benefit

E = expectation over parameter uncertainty

Supporting Formulae

Net Monetary Benefit:

NMB = ?E ? C

Population EVPI:

Population EVPI = EVPI ? N

where:

N = affected population over the decision relevance period

Related Mathematical Methods

  • Value of Information Analysis
  • Expected Value of Partial Perfect Information
  • Expected Value of Sample Information
  • Expected Net Benefit of Sampling
  • Probabilistic Sensitivity Analysis
  • Bayesian Decision Theory
  • Net Monetary Benefit

Example


A probabilistic sensitivity analysis estimates an expected maximum net monetary benefit of �18,250 per patient if perfect information were available. Under current evidence, the maximum expected net monetary benefit is �17,900 per patient.

EVPI = �18,250 ? �17,900

EVPI = �350 per patient

If 25,000 patients are expected to be affected during the decision relevance period, the population EVPI is:

Population EVPI = �350 ? 25,000 = �8.75 million

This indicates that eliminating all uncertainty could generate a maximum societal value of �8.75 million.

Excel Implementation

FunctionExample FormulaHealth Economics Application
MAX=MAX(B2:D2)Identify the maximum net monetary benefit for each simulation.
AVERAGE=AVERAGE(E2:E10001)Calculate the expected value of the maximum net monetary benefit.
MAX=MAX(AVERAGE(B2:B10001),AVERAGE(C2:C10001),AVERAGE(D2:D10001))Calculate the maximum expected net monetary benefit under current information.
SUMPRODUCT=EVPI_per_patient*PopulationCalculate the population EVPI.

VBA (Optional)


VBA can automate EVPI estimation from probabilistic sensitivity analysis outputs and calculate population EVPI across alternative decision scenarios.

Sources

  • Claxton K. The irrelevance of inference: a decision-making approach to the stochastic evaluation of health care technologies. Journal of Health Economics. 1999;18(3):341?364.
  • Briggs A, Claxton K, Sculpher M. Decision Modelling for Health Economic Evaluation. Oxford University Press.
  • Fenwick E, Claxton K, Sculpher M. Representing uncertainty: the role of cost-effectiveness acceptability curves. Health Economics. 2001;10(8):779?787.
  • ISPOR Value of Information Good Practice Reports.
  • NICE. NICE Health Technology Evaluations: The Manual.

Library

Publications

2
  • Journal article

    Value of Information Analysis for Research Decisions — An Introduction: Report 1 of the ISPOR Value of Information Analysis Emerging Good Practices Task Force — Fenwick, Steuten, Knies, Ghabri, Basu, Murray, Koffijberg, Strong, Sanders Schmidler & Rothery, Vol. 23, No. 2 ed., 2020 (Value in Health)

    The introductory ISPOR good-practice report on value-of-information (VOI) analysis, explaining how VOI quantifies the value of reducing decision uncertainty through further research and where it fits in resource-allocation decisions.

  • Journal article

    Value of Information Analytical Methods: Report 2 of the ISPOR Value of Information Analysis Emerging Good Practices Task Force — Rothery, Strong, Koffijberg, Basu, Ghabri, Knies, Murray, Sanders Schmidler, Steuten & Fenwick, Vol. 23, No. 3 ed., 2020 (Value in Health)

    The methods companion to the ISPOR VOI series, giving detailed algorithms and software guidance for computing EVPI, EVPPI, EVSI and the expected net benefit of sampling, with recommendations for selecting methods by decision-problem features.

Media

3
  • Media

    Examples of Graphs Used in Cost-Effectiveness and Value-of-Information Analyses — (NCBI Bookshelf — Institute of Medicine), Open access ed., 2011 (National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI))

    An open-access figure set illustrating the three core visual outputs of a probabilistic cost-effectiveness analysis: the cost-effectiveness plane scatter, the acceptability curve (CEAC), and the acceptability frontier with an EVPI graph.

  • MediaFeatured

    heemod: Markov Models for Health Economic Evaluations (Package Tutorials) — Antoine Filipovic-Pierucci, Kevin Zarca & Isabelle Durand-Zaleski, Package documentation ed., 2023 (heemod / GitHub Pages)

    The official tutorial site for the heemod R package, with worked walkthroughs for building Markov models, running PSA and DSA, computing EVPI and performing budget-impact analysis — mirroring the standard decision-modelling textbook workflow.

  • Media

    BCEA: Bayesian Cost-Effectiveness Analysis with R (Tutorials) — Gianluca Baio, Andrea Berardi & Anna Heath, Package documentation ed., 2023 (BCEA project)

    Tutorials for the BCEA R package, demonstrating Bayesian post-processing of probabilistic cost-effectiveness models — acceptability curves, EVPI/EVPPI and standardised value-of-information graphics.

Tools & Resources

2
  • OtherFeatured

    SAVI — Sheffield Accelerated Value of Information — Mark Strong, Jeremy Oakley & Penny Breeze (University of Sheffield), Web application ed., 2024 (University of Sheffield)

    A free, open-access web calculator that computes value-of-information measures (EVPI, partial EVPI/EVPPI and EVSI) directly from a model’s probabilistic sensitivity analysis output — no need to re-run the model. Also reports payer strategy-specific and uncertainty burden.

  • Other

    BCEAweb — Bayesian Cost-Effectiveness Analysis Web Interface — Gianluca Baio, Andrea Berardi & Anna Heath, Web application ed., 2023 (University College London)

    A user-friendly web front-end to the BCEA R package: users upload probabilistic model output and obtain standardised cost-effectiveness summaries — cost-effectiveness planes, acceptability curves, EVPI and EVPPI — without writing R code.

Frequently Asked Questions (6)

  • What is EVPI?

    The maximum amount a decision-maker should pay to eliminate all uncertainty surrounding a technology decision, comparing outcomes under perfect versus existing information.

    Source: Raiffa & Schlaifer 1961

  • Why is EVPI an upper bound on the value of research?

    The expected value of perfect information is what a decision-maker should be willing to pay to remove all uncertainty from a decision, calculated as the gain from always choosing correctly rather than choosing under present uncertainty. Because no real study could ever eliminate every uncertainty, it is the most that any research on that decision could possibly be worth, and it sets a ceiling. If it is smaller than the cost of research, no study is justified. It bounds the value of further evidence. Claxton and Sculpher (2006) describe this.

    Source: Claxton & Sculpher 2006

  • How is EVPI calculated?

    EVPI is calculated as the difference between the expected outcome with perfect information and the expected outcome with current information. With perfect information, one would choose the best option for each possible set of parameter values, so the expected value of a perfect-information decision is the average, over the parameter uncertainty, of the best outcome for each set; with current information, one chooses the single option with the highest expected value. Subtracting the latter from the former gives EVPI, the expected value of removing all uncertainty.

    Source: Raiffa & Schlaifer 1961

  • Why is EVPI useful?

    EVPI is useful because it places an upper bound on the value of further research: since no study can provide more than perfect information, no research can be worth more than EVPI, so if EVPI is below the likely cost of research, further study is not worthwhile. EVPI also indicates the overall scale of decision uncertainty in monetary or health terms. Computed for the population over the decision's relevance period, it helps decide whether investigating the decision further could be justified at all.

    Source: Claxton & Posnett 1996

  • How does EVPI relate to decision uncertainty?

    EVPI relates to decision uncertainty because it arises only when there is a chance of making the wrong decision: if the preferred option were certainly best, perfect information would change nothing and EVPI would be zero, whereas greater decision uncertainty, with a higher chance and consequence of error, gives a larger EVPI. EVPI thus expresses decision uncertainty in terms of the expected value of resolving it. So it translates the probability and cost of choosing wrongly into the worth of eliminating all parameter uncertainty.

    Source: Claxton & Posnett 1996

  • What are the limitations of EVPI?

    EVPI assumes all uncertainty could be eliminated, which no real study achieves, so it gives an upper bound rather than the value of a feasible study, for which the expected value of sample information is needed. It depends on the model and its assumed parameter distributions, and on the population and decision relevance period used to scale it. It values information only through the decision it informs. These limitations mean EVPI is used as a screening bound and a measure of overall decision uncertainty, complemented by partial and sample information measures.

    Source: Raiffa & Schlaifer 1961

Trust Record

Verified by Dr Darrin Baines

British health economist

Professional identity: darrinbaines.org

Verification date: 31 Oct 2025

Content version: 1.0.0

Canonical Identity

Term code
HE-EM-VI-009

Stable URI · Machine-readable · Resolvable · CC BY 4.0