Maximin health social welfare of three groups as the Rawlsian limit

Sets social welfare equal to the health of the least healthy group, the Rawlsian or maximin form. Atkinson gives it as the limit of the isoelastic family as epsilon tends to infinity (HE-FM-SWF-001), and Dolan and Tsuchiya as the limit of the two-group CES form as r approaches infinity (HE-FM-SWF-004). Two allocations with the same minimum have the same W and are ranked as tied however the other groups fare, so a gain to a healthier group alone leaves W unchanged. The nested min written here returns the smallest of the three values.

Signature

W = min(h_1, min(h_2, h_3))
Inputs
InputsDefinitionUnit
h_1Health of the first groupyears of QALE
h_2Health of the second groupyears of QALE
h_3Health of the third groupyears of QALE
Output
WSocial welfare under the maximin form, the health of the least healthy groupyears of QALE

Function

Health social welfare function ranking distributions of health

Maps the health of n people, or of n groups of equal size, and the parameters theta that state a distributional value judgement to a single social welfare value W, so that allocations can be ranked when they differ in who gains as well as in how much is gained. When W rises whenever one person's health rises and nobody's falls, every Pareto improvement raises welfare. The package gives Atkinson's isoelastic additive form for epsilon other than 1, its logarithmic form at epsilon of 1, the maximin limit, the two-group CES form of Wagstaff and the slope of its social indifference curve. The equally distributed equivalent (EDE) health that gives the same W is live as HE-FM-ATK-002 and HE-FM-ATK-003, the Atkinson index as HE-FM-ATK-001, the relative weight on a small gain as HE-FM-ATK-004 and equity-weighted QALY totals as HE-FM-EQWA-001, and HE-FM-WE-004 holds the linear two-group welfare with a switching weight; none is redrafted here. The health forgone for equity and the inequality aversion at which two options swap rank are left to the Equity-Efficiency Trade-off and Distributional Cost-Effectiveness packages. Notation follows the Social Welfare Function article.

Try this function

Implementations

  • Excel

    Maximin social welfare from named cells

    With the named cells of HE-IM-SWF-001 the formula returns W in a cell named MaximinWelfare.

    =MIN(HealthFirstGroup,HealthSecondGroup,HealthThirdGroup)

Assumptions

  • Maximin welfare compares groups at their mean health

    Each h_i is the mean health of a group, so the form protects the least healthy group on average and not its least healthy member, and the result depends on how the population is divided into groups.

Worked examples

  • Maximin welfare of the option for the worst off

    Option R in the article's illustrative example gives the least healthy group 61.2 years, the highest minimum of the three options, so R ranks first under maximin.

    h_1 = 61.2; h_2 = 67.6; h_3 = 75.6; W = 61.2
  • Maximin welfare of the population-wide option

    Option P gives the least healthy group 60.3 years and ranks last under maximin, although it has the largest total.

    h_1 = 60.3; h_2 = 68.5; h_3 = 76.7; W = 60.3

Common errors

  • Reading maximin health welfare as Rawls's own theory

    The maximin health form borrows Rawls's priority for the worst off, but Brouwer and colleagues note that Rawls explicitly excluded health and health care from his list of primary goods, so the health version is an analogy drawn from his work.

  • Expecting maximin welfare to credit gains to healthier groups

    Raising the third group in option P from 76.7 to 80 years leaves W at 60.3, so a programme that helps only healthier groups scores no gain under maximin even though nobody is worse off.

Sources

  • Atkinson on the minimum as the limit of isoelastic social welfare

    Atkinson AB. On the measurement of inequality. Journal of Economic Theory. 1970;2(3):244-263. Page 257, which states that the limiting case as epsilon tends to infinity gives the function min_i(y_i), which takes account only of transfers to the very lowest income group and is therefore not strictly concave.

    View source →

  • Brouwer and colleagues on Rawls and health as a primary good

    Brouwer WB, Culyer AJ, van Exel NJ, Rutten FF. Welfarism vs. extra-welfarism. Journal of Health Economics. 2008;27(2):325-338. Section 3 on extra-welfarism, which notes that Rawls explicitly excluded both health and health care from the list of primary goods.

    View source →

Canonical Identity

Stable URI · Machine-readable · Resolvable · CC BY 4.0

Maximin health social welfare of three groups as the Rawlsian limit | HealthEconomics.wiki