VerifiedEvidence: highv1.0.0

Utility

A numerical representation of the satisfaction, wellbeing, or preference an individual derives from a particular outcome, state, or good.

Last reviewedDarrin Baines IP Ltd

Concept Architecture

Concept

Theoretically, Utility is a cardinal measure of the strength of preference for a health state, representing the desirability of that state on a scale anchored by full health and death. Within health economics, utility is grounded in expected utility theory and multi-attribute utility theory, providing the basis for valuing health outcomes under certainty and uncertainty. Utility enables health-related quality of life to be incorporated into economic evaluation through the calculation of quality-adjusted life years (QALYs).

Mathematically, utility is represented as a numerical value on a preference scale, conventionally ranging from 0 for death to 1 for full health, although values below 0 may be assigned to health states considered worse than death. Utility values are estimated using recognised elicitation methods such as Standard Gamble, Time Trade-Off, or Discrete Choice Experiments with duration, and are incorporated into QALY calculations by weighting survival time according to health-related quality of life.

In practice, utility values are obtained directly from preference elicitation exercises or indirectly from validated preference-based instruments such as the EQ-5D, HUI, AQoL, or SF-6D using published value sets. These utilities are applied in cost-utility analyses, decision-analytic models, and health technology assessments to compare interventions on a common preference-based outcome scale.


Purpose

Used to quantify preferences for health states, enabling the estimation of quality-adjusted life years and supporting cost-utility analysis, decision modelling, and health technology assessment.


Mathematical Formulae

Primary Formula

QALY = ????� U?T?

where:

  • U? = utility associated with health state i
  • T? = time spent in health state i

Supporting Formulae

For a single health state:

QALY = U ? T

Expected utility:

EU = ????� p?U?

where:

  • p? = probability of outcome i
  • U? = utility of outcome i

Related Mathematical Methods

  • Expected utility theory
  • Multi-attribute utility theory
  • Standard Gamble
  • Time Trade-Off
  • Discrete Choice Experiment with duration
  • Quality-adjusted life year estimation
  • Preference weighting

Example

A patient has a utility value of 0.82 after treatment and remains in this health state for 4 years.

QALY = 0.82 ? 4 = 3.28

The intervention therefore produces 3.28 quality-adjusted life years over the evaluation period.


Excel Implementation

FunctionExample FormulaHealth Economics Application
PRODUCT=B2*C2Calculates QALYs for a single health state by multiplying utility by time.
SUMPRODUCT=SUMPRODUCT(B2:B10,C2:C10)Calculates total QALYs across multiple health states or model cycles.
XLOOKUP=XLOOKUP(A2,Tariff[State],Tariff[Utility])Retrieves the utility associated with a coded health state from a published value set.
AVERAGE=AVERAGE(B2:B101)Estimates the mean utility across study participants.

VBA (Optional)

Automate retrieval of utility values from published tariffs and calculate patient-level or cohort QALYs across multiple health states.


Sources

  • von Neumann J, Morgenstern O. Theory of Games and Economic Behavior. Princeton University Press.
  • Torrance GW. Social preferences for health states: An empirical evaluation of three measurement techniques. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences. 1976;10(3):129?136.
  • Brazier J, Ratcliffe J, Salomon JA, Tsuchiya A. Measuring and Valuing Health Benefits for Economic Evaluation. Oxford University Press.
  • Drummond MF, et al. Methods for the Economic Evaluation of Health Care Programmes. Oxford University Press.
  • NICE. Health Technology Evaluation Manual.

Library

Publications

1
  • Guidance

    NICE DSU Technical Support Document 8: An Introduction to the Measurement and Valuation of Health for NICE Submissions — Brazier, Rowen, TSD 8 ed., 2011 (NICE Decision Support Unit (University of Sheffield))

    An introduction to the measurement and valuation of health for NICE submissions — the QALY, health-state utility values, generic preference-based measures, and the requirements of the NICE reference case.

Frequently Asked Questions (6)

  • What is utility?

    A numerical representation of the satisfaction, wellbeing, or preference an individual derives from a particular outcome, state, or good.

    Source: von Neumann & Morgenstern 1944

  • How did the meaning of utility change from Bentham to modern economics?

    For Bentham and the early utilitarians, utility meant an actual quantity of pleasure or pain that a person felt, something in principle measurable and comparable across people. Modern economics abandoned that claim and redefined utility as a way of representing preferences, a number assigned so that more preferred options receive higher values, with no suggestion that it measures felt sensation or can be compared between individuals. The word survived while its meaning narrowed. Broome (1991) traces this shift in the concept.

    Source: Broome 1991

  • How is utility used in health economics?

    In health economics, utility measures the desirability of a health state, typically on a scale where full health is one and death zero, so that time spent in a state can be weighted by its utility. These utilities, elicited by valuation methods and combined with length of life, form quality-adjusted life years, the outcome measure of cost-utility analysis. Utility thus provides the common metric that lets health outcomes across conditions be compared and valued.

    Source: von Neumann & Morgenstern 1944

  • What is the difference between decision and experienced utility?

    Decision utility is the value revealed by choice, reflecting what a person anticipates an outcome will be like, while experienced utility is the actual satisfaction or suffering undergone during it. The two can diverge if people mispredict how outcomes will feel. In health, values elicited from the public imagining states are decision utilities, which may differ from the experienced utility of patients living in them, raising the question of which should inform decisions.

    Source: von Neumann & Morgenstern 1944

  • What assumptions underlie utility?

    Representing preferences by a utility requires that they be consistent, notably complete, so any two outcomes can be compared, and transitive, so rankings do not cycle. Under uncertainty, expected utility adds conditions on how gambles are valued. Given these, choices can be described as maximising utility. Observed behaviour often violates the assumptions, so utility describes an idealised representation of preference rather than an exact account of how people value outcomes.

    Source: von Neumann & Morgenstern 1944

  • Why is utility central to economic evaluation?

    Utility is central because economic evaluation needs a measure of the value of health outcomes that can be combined with length of life and compared across conditions, and utility provides it, expressing the desirability of health states on a common scale. Weighting time by utility yields quality-adjusted life years, which let interventions for different conditions be compared on a single outcome. Without utility, health outcomes could not be valued and aggregated in the way cost-utility analysis requires.

    Source: von Neumann & Morgenstern 1944

Trust Record

Verified by Dr Darrin Baines

British health economist

Professional identity: darrinbaines.org

Verification date: 25 Sep 2026

Content version: 1.0.0

Canonical Identity

Term code
HE-EE-HU-079

Stable URI · Machine-readable · Resolvable · CC BY 4.0