Cost-Effectiveness Analysis

Terms used to compare the costs and health effects of alternative interventions and judge value for money.

  • Topic: Cost-Effectiveness Analysis
  • 42 terms
  • Editor reviewed

1–8 of 13 terms

ComparatorControl Intervention, Reference Arm

The alternative intervention, treatment, or strategy against which a new option is evaluated in an economic evaluation.

Cost per QALYCost/QALY, Cost per Quality-Adjusted Life Year

A measure of value for money in cost-utility analysis, calculated as incremental cost divided by the quality-adjusted life years gained relative to a comparator.

Cost-Benefit AnalysisCBA, Benefit-Cost Analysis

Cost-benefit analysis is a full economic evaluation that values the differences in the costs and consequences of healthcare alternatives in monetary terms so that their net social value can be compared.

Cost-Consequence AnalysisCCA, Disaggregated Cost-Outcome Analysis

An evaluation that displays each option’s costs and range of outcomes separately, allowing decision-makers to consider them without a combined summary result.

Cost-Effectiveness Acceptability Curve (CEAC)Cost-Effectiveness Acceptability Curve, CEAC

A graph plotting the probability an intervention is cost-effective against a range of possible values for the cost-effectiveness threshold.

Cost-Effectiveness Acceptability FrontierCEAF, Acceptability Frontier

A curve showing, across willingness-to-pay thresholds, the probability that the option with the highest expected net benefit at each threshold is truly optimal.

Cost-Effectiveness AnalysisCEA, Cost per Outcome Analysis

Cost-effectiveness analysis compares healthcare alternatives by relating differences in their costs to differences in outcomes measured using the same natural unit, such as cases prevented or life-years gained.

Cost-Effectiveness FrontierCE Frontier, Cost-Effectiveness Efficiency Frontier, Efficient Frontier in Cost-Effectiveness Analysis

The cost-effectiveness frontier is the boundary of feasible strategies whose expected cost and effect combinations are not ruled out by strict or extended dominance under a specified decision framework.