Share of the maximum added effect at a dose expressed as a multiple of ED50

Dividing the added effect by E_max shows that the share of the maximum depends only on k, the dose as a multiple of ED_50, and on the Hill coefficient. At k = 1 the share is one half for any h; above ED_50 a larger h gives a larger share.

Signature

k = D / ED_50; S = k^h / (1 + k^h)
Inputs
InputsDefinitionUnit
DDose of the drugmg
ED_50Dose giving half the maximum added effectmg
hSteepness of the curve around ED_50none
Output
kDose divided by ED_50ratio
SAdded effect at the dose divided by E_maxproportion

Function

Dose-response curves and the dose-dependent drug cost behind incremental cost per extra responder

Links the expected response to the dose through the sigmoid Emax curve and the dose to the drug cost actually paid, through whole single-use vials and relative dose intensity, so that doses can be compared by the incremental cost per extra unit of effect. The incremental ratio between adjacent doses is HE-FM-ICER-001 with the sequential rules of HE-FM-CEA-001 and HE-FM-DOM-002, and the average ratio against placebo HE-FM-ACER-002. Notation follows the Dose Response article.

Try this function

Implementations

  • Excel

    Share of the maximum effect from named cells

    With DoseMg, ED50Dose and HillCoef named as in HE-FM-DOSE-001, the formulas return the dose multiple and the share of the maximum effect, held in DoseMultiple and MaxShare.

    =DoseMg/ED50Dose; =DoseMultiple^HillCoef/(1+DoseMultiple^HillCoef)

Assumptions

  • Same sigmoid Emax curve as the response formula

    The share follows from HE-FM-DOSE-001 by subtracting E_0 and dividing by E_max, so it carries the same assumptions about the curve.

Worked examples

  • Doubling the dose from ED50 with a hyperbolic curve

    With h = 1, a dose of twice ED_50 reaches 2 / 3 of the maximum effect, 0.667, against 0.5 at ED_50, as in the article.

    D = 200; ED_50 = 100; h = 1; k = 2; S = 0.667
  • Doubling the dose from ED50 with a Hill coefficient of 2

    With h = 2 the same doubling reaches 4 / 5 of the maximum, 0.80, as in the article.

    D = 200; ED_50 = 100; h = 2; k = 2; S = 0.8
  • Half the maximum effect at ED50

    At D = ED_50 the share is one half whatever the Hill coefficient, as the definition of ED_50 requires.

    D = 100; ED_50 = 100; h = 2; k = 1; S = 0.5

Common errors

  • Assuming that doubling the dose doubles the effect

    From ED_50, doubling the dose raises the share of the maximum effect from 0.5 to 0.667 with h = 1 and to 0.80 with h = 2, never to 1, so a linear dose-response assumption overstates the benefit of higher doses.

Sources

  • DoseFinding parameters of the sigmoid Emax model

    Bornkamp B, Pinheiro J, Bretz F, et al. DoseFinding: Planning and Analyzing Dose Finding Experiments. R package version 1.4-1. 2025. Reference manual, help page drmodels (full text read). drmodels, Arguments and Details: ed50 is the dose giving half of the asymptotic maximum effect and h the Hill parameter determining the steepness of the model at the ED50; the sigmoid Emax model describes monotonic, sigmoid dose-response relationships.

    View source →

Canonical Identity