Population EVPI over the decision's lifetime

Multiplies per-person EVPI by the discounted number of people expected to face the decision in each period while it remains relevant. The result is compared with the cost of research: when it is below the cost of any feasible study, further research is not worthwhile on these grounds.

Signature

EVPI_pop = EVPI * sum_(t=0)^T [N_t / (1+r)^t]
Inputs
InputsDefinitionUnit
EVPIExpected value of perfect information for one person facing the decisioncurrency per person
N_tNumber of people whose treatment choice is informed by the decision in period t, listed across periodspeople per period
rRate used to discount the value to people facing the decision in later periodsproportion per year
tTime of each period from the start of the decision, listed across periodsyears
Output
EVPI_popExpected value of perfect information for everyone expected to face the decision over its lifetimecurrency
  • T Last period in which the decision is expected to remain relevant (years)

Function

Value of information function

Maps the joint distribution of net benefit across the options in a decision to the expected gain from resolving some or all of the uncertainty before choosing, compared with choosing the option with the highest expected net benefit on current information.

Try this function

Implementations

  • Excel

    Population EVPI from a period table

    With the numbers of people in the named range Population, the period times in Period and the discount rate in Rate, SUMPRODUCT discounts each cohort and Excel multiplies the total by per-person EVPI.

    =EVPI*SUMPRODUCT(Population/(1+Rate)^Period)

Assumptions

  • Stated timing and horizon

    The first period is t equal to 0 and is not discounted; if the first cohort is to be discounted, t starts at 1. The time horizon stands in for future changes in technologies, prices and evidence, so it is stated and justified.

  • Only people who can benefit are counted

    N_t excludes people whose treatment is decided before new evidence could be available, and it can be reduced for incomplete adoption. Per-person EVPI is assumed to apply unchanged to every period.

Worked examples

  • 1,000 people a year for five years

    Per-person EVPI is £200, and 1,000 people a year face the decision for five years, from t equal to 0 to 4, with future cohorts discounted at an illustrative 3.5% a year. The discounted population is about 4,673 people, so population EVPI is about £934,616. The figures are illustrative.

    EVPI = 200; T = 4; t = [0,1,2,3,4]; N_t = [1000,1000,1000,1000,1000]; r = 0.035; EVPI_pop = 934615.84
  • Undiscounted population of 20,000

    Per-person EVPI is £1,800 and 2,000 patients a year face the decision for ten years, with discounting ignored for simplicity. The 20,000 patients give a population EVPI of £36 million, matching the worked example on the expected net benefit page.

    EVPI = 1800; T = 9; t = [0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9]; N_t = [2000,2000,2000,2000,2000,2000,2000,2000,2000,2000]; r = 0; EVPI_pop = 36000000

Common errors

  • Scaling by everyone with the condition indefinitely

    Multiplying per-person EVPI by all current and future patients, with no time horizon or exclusion of those treated before evidence arrives, overstates the value of research.

Sources

  • Time horizons for research decisions

    Philips Z, Claxton K, Palmer S. The half-life of truth: what are appropriate time horizons for research decisions? Medical Decision Making. 2008;28(3):287-299.

    View source →

  • ISPOR introduction to value of information

    Fenwick E, Steuten L, Knies S, Ghabri S, Basu A, Murray JF, Koffijberg HE, Strong M, Sanders Schmidler GD, Rothery C. Value of information analysis for research decisions: an introduction. Report 1 of the ISPOR Value of Information Analysis Emerging Good Practices Task Force. Value in Health. 2020;23(2):139-150.

    View source →

Canonical Identity

Stable URI · Machine-readable · Resolvable · CC BY 4.0