Pigouvian tax and efficient quantity with linear demand and rising marginal external cost

With marginal private benefit (the demand curve) a minus b × Q, a constant marginal private cost c and a marginal external cost m plus g × Q, consumers left alone choose Q_0, where marginal private benefit equals c. The efficient quantity Q_star sets marginal private benefit equal to marginal social cost, c plus the marginal external cost. The Pigouvian tax t_star is the marginal external cost at Q_star, and adding it to the private cost moves the private choice to Q_star.

Signature

Q_0 = (a - c) / b; Q_star = (a - c - m) / (b + g); t_star = m + g * Q_star
Inputs
InputsDefinitionUnit
aMarginal private benefit at zero consumptionpounds per unit
cCost of one more unit borne by the consumer before any taxpounds per unit
bFall in marginal private benefit per thousand units, above zeropounds per unit per thousand units
mMarginal external cost of the first unit, zero or abovepounds per unit
gRise in marginal external cost per thousand units, zero when the external cost per unit is constantpounds per unit per thousand units
Output
Q_0Quantity at which marginal private benefit equals marginal private costthousand units a year
Q_starQuantity at which marginal private benefit equals marginal social costthousand units a year
t_starTax per unit equal to the marginal external cost at Q_starpounds per unit

Function

Pigouvian tax on a negative externality set at marginal external cost at the efficient quantity

Finds the quantity at which the marginal private benefit of an activity equals its marginal social cost, the marginal private cost plus the marginal external cost, and sets a tax per unit equal to the marginal external cost at that quantity, so that the decision-maker faces the full social cost of each unit. It is the negative-externality mirror of the vaccination subsidy HE-FM-EXT-002 within the social marginal cost and benefit framework HE-FM-EXT-001 on the Externality page. The formulae below apply the rule with a linear demand curve, a constant marginal private cost and a marginal external cost that rises with the quantity consumed.

Try this function

Implementations

  • Excel

    Untaxed quantity, efficient quantity and Pigouvian tax in three cells

    With the curve parameters in DemandIntercept, DemandSlope, PrivCost, ExtIntercept and ExtSlope, the three formulas return the untaxed quantity in PrivateQty, the efficient quantity in EfficientQty and the Pigouvian tax in PigouTax.

    =(DemandIntercept-PrivCost)/DemandSlope; =(DemandIntercept-PrivCost-ExtIntercept)/(DemandSlope+ExtSlope); =ExtIntercept+ExtSlope*EfficientQty

Assumptions

  • Demand measures the true benefit to consumers

    The demand curve is the marginal private benefit, so there are no internalities, and the market is otherwise undistorted. A tax that also targets costs people impose on themselves follows a different rule.

  • Linear curves and an interior efficient quantity

    Marginal private benefit falls and marginal external cost rises linearly over the relevant range, marginal private cost is constant, and a is greater than c plus m, so the efficient quantity is above zero.

  • Tax passed through in full to the price consumers face

    The tax raises the private cost of each unit by t_star, so consumers move along the same demand curve to the point where marginal private benefit equals c plus t_star.

Worked examples

  • Tax of 3.20 pounds with external cost rising at 0.025 per thousand units

    In the article's illustrative product, marginal private benefit is 20 minus 0.1Q pounds, marginal private cost is 4 pounds and marginal external cost is 0.025Q pounds, with Q in thousands of units a year. Consumers choose 160 thousand units, the efficient quantity is 128 thousand and the Pigouvian tax is 3.20 pounds per unit. The tax also raises 3.2 × 128 = 409.6, or 409,600 pounds a year, which is a transfer from consumers to the government and not a cost to society.

    a = 20; b = 0.1; c = 4; m = 0; g = 0.025; Q_0 = 160; Q_star = 128; t_star = 3.2
  • Constant marginal external cost of 3.20 pounds per unit

    If each unit imposed a constant external cost of 3.20 pounds, the efficient quantity and the tax would be the same as in the article's example, and the external cost measured before the tax would give the right rate. The case is computed here for illustration and is not printed in the article.

    a = 20; b = 0.1; c = 4; m = 3.2; g = 0; Q_0 = 160; Q_star = 128; t_star = 3.2
  • No external cost leaves consumption untaxed

    With m and g both zero the private and efficient quantities coincide at 160 thousand units and the Pigouvian tax is zero, a limiting case that checks the formula.

    a = 20; b = 0.1; c = 4; m = 0; g = 0; Q_0 = 160; Q_star = 160; t_star = 0

Common errors

  • Average external cost used instead of marginal

    Dividing the total external cost at the efficient quantity by the number of units gives an average of 1.60 pounds per unit in the article's example, half the marginal 3.20 pounds, because the external cost rises with consumption. A tax of 1.60 pounds leaves consumption at 144 thousand units, well above the efficient 128 thousand. These figures are computed here for illustration.

  • Pigouvian tax revenue counted as a cost to society

    The 409,600 pounds raised in the article's example is a transfer from consumers to the government and cancels out at the level of society. Counting it as a cost, or as part of the welfare gain, misstates the case for the tax, which comes from the change in consumption.

Sources

  • Pigou on the rate of tax with the optimum effect

    Pigou AC. The Economics of Welfare. 4th ed. London: Macmillan; 1932. First published 1920. Part II, Chapter IX, section 13, on bounties and taxes as the most obvious ways for the State to encourage or restrain an activity whose social and private net products diverge, and Chapter XI, section 11, which states that there is one rate of tax that would have the optimum effect.

    View source →

  • External cost priced at the socially optimal level

    Fullerton D, Leicester A, Smith S. Environmental taxes. NBER Working Paper 14197. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research; 2008. Section 5.2, which states that the carbon price should reflect the damage from the marginal tonne of carbon dioxide at the socially optimal level of abatement, as with any other externality tax.

    View source →

  • Average and marginal damage in the calculation of a Pigouvian tax

    Coase RH. The problem of social cost. Journal of Law and Economics. 1960;3:1-44. Section IX, which notes that a tax proposal of this kind faces the problem of calculation and the difference between average and marginal damage.

    View source →

Canonical Identity