Mean survival from one-year survival and a constant later hazard, under dependent censoring

Extrapolates mean survival from one-year survival S_1 and conditional survival through year 2, q_2, assuming a constant hazard in year 1 and the year-2 hazard thereafter. The first term is the area under the curve in year 1 and the second the area of the exponential tail; it is the two-interval case of HE-FM-BTH-002, written in survival probabilities. Fed with a q_2 biased by dependent censoring, it shows how a small gap at two years becomes a large gap in life expectancy.

Signature

T_bar = (1 - S_1) / (-log(S_1)) + S_1 / (-log(q_2))
Inputs
InputsDefinitionUnit
S_1Probability of surviving the first year; above 0 and below 1probability
q_2Probability of surviving year 2 given alive at one year, also applied to every later year; above 0 and below 1probability
Output
T_barMean survival in years under the two-piece constant hazardyears

Function

Inverse probability of censoring weighting for dependent censoring

Maps patients who remain under observation to weights equal to the inverse of their probability of having remained uncensored, given their covariate history, so that they also represent similar patients who were censored. Weighted versions of the Kaplan-Meier estimator, the Cox model and mean cost estimators then remove the bias that dependent censoring causes, provided every factor predicting both censoring and outcome is measured. The notation follows the Dependent Censoring article and its switchers-censored control arm.

Try this function

Implementations

  • Excel

    Two-piece mean survival from named survival probabilities

    With SurvYearOne and CondSurvTwo named, the formula returns mean survival, held in MeanSurv.

    =(1-SurvYearOne)/(-LN(SurvYearOne))+SurvYearOne/(-LN(CondSurvTwo))

Assumptions

  • Constant hazard within year 1 and a constant hazard after year 1

    Survival is exponential within the first year and from year 1 onwards with the year-2 hazard, an illustrative extrapolation; mean survival is the area under the extrapolated curve.

  • Year-2 conditional survival free of censoring bias

    q_2 estimates what would have happened without switching only if it comes from an analysis that removes the dependence, such as IPCW.

Worked examples

  • Mean survival without switching or with IPCW

    With S_1 of 0.75 and q_2 of 0.78 the hazards are 0.2877 and 0.2485, so mean survival is 0.869 plus 0.75 / 0.2485, about 3.8876 years (3.89 in the article).

    S_1 = 0.75; q_2 = 0.78; T_bar = 3.8876
  • Mean survival with switchers censored

    With q_2 of 0.825 the year-2 hazard is 0.1924 and mean survival about 4.7677 years (4.77 in the article), 0.88 life-years more than the target, as in the article.

    S_1 = 0.75; q_2 = 0.825; T_bar = 4.7677

Common errors

  • Extrapolating a hazard biased by dependent censoring

    A 3.4-point gap in two-year survival becomes 0.88 life-years once the censored-analysis hazard is extrapolated, inflating control survival and shrinking the incremental QALY gain.

  • Using one minus a survival probability as the hazard

    Taking each hazard as 1 minus the survival probability, 0.25 and 0.22, gives 1.0 plus 3.41, about 4.41 years, instead of 3.89; hazards are minus the log of survival.

Sources

  • Mean life expectancy as the area under the extrapolated survival curve

    Woods B, Sideris E, Palmer S, Latimer N, Soares M. NICE DSU Technical Support Document 19: Partitioned survival analysis for decision modelling in health care: a critical review. Sheffield: Decision Support Unit, ScHARR, University of Sheffield; 2017. Section 1: in partitioned survival analysis state membership comes from non-mutually exclusive survival curves, and the area under the (extrapolated) overall survival curve provides an estimate of mean life expectancy; section 2: analysing quality-adjusted survival with standard survival methods induced informative censoring, as people with worse quality of life were more likely to be censored earlier.

    View source →

Canonical Identity