Mean, standard deviation and coefficient of variation of a group's total net claims

Gives the expected value, standard deviation and coefficient of variation of a group's total net claims when members' claims are independent with a common mean and standard deviation. Total claims grow in proportion to n but their spread only with the square root of n, so the relative spread falls as the group grows. The function sqrt is the square root.

Signature

E_S = n * mu; SD_S = sigma * sqrt(n); CV_S = sigma / (mu * sqrt(n))
Inputs
InputsDefinitionUnit
nNumber of covered members whose claims are pooledcount
muExpected annual eligible claims per member net of specific recoveriesdollars per member
sigmaStandard deviation of one member's annual net claimsdollars per member
Output
E_SExpected annual net claims of the whole groupdollars
SD_SStandard deviation of the group's annual net claimsdollars
CV_SStandard deviation of total net claims divided by expected total net claimsratio

Function

Aggregate stop-loss payment and expected payment function

Maps a self-funded employer's eligible claims for the contract year, net of specific stop-loss recoveries, to the payment due from the aggregate stop-loss carrier and the claims the employer retains, given the aggregate attachment point and any maximum aggregate payment. Applied to the distribution of the year's claims instead of one realised year, the same rule gives the carrier's expected payment, the net stop-loss premium before any loading. The records follow the notation of the Aggregate Stop-Loss article, where S is net claims for the year, A is the aggregate attachment point and L is the carrier's payment.

Try this function

Implementations

  • Excel

    Pooled claims mean, spread and coefficient of variation in three cells

    With named cells Members, MeanMember and SDMember, the three formulas return expected total claims, their standard deviation and the coefficient of variation.

    =Members*MeanMember; =SDMember*SQRT(Members); =SDMember/(MeanMember*SQRT(Members))

Assumptions

  • Independent members' claims in the pooled group

    Members' net claims are independent, so their variances add. Shared shocks such as an epidemic make claims correlated, and the true standard deviation of total claims is then larger than sigma times the square root of n.

  • Common mean and standard deviation for every member

    Every member has the same expected net claims and standard deviation. With different values the expected total is the sum of the members' means and the variance the sum of their variances.

Worked examples

  • Total claims distribution for a 200-member group

    With mean net claims of $7,500 and a standard deviation of $15,000 per member, 200 members give expected claims of $1,500,000, a standard deviation of about $212,132 and a coefficient of variation of about 0.1414.

    n = 200; mu = 7500; sigma = 15000; E_S = 1500000; SD_S = 212132.03; CV_S = 0.1414
  • Total claims distribution for a 20-member group

    The same per-member figures for 20 members give expected claims of $150,000, a standard deviation of about $67,082 and a coefficient of variation of about 0.4472, more than three times that of the larger group.

    n = 20; mu = 7500; sigma = 15000; E_S = 150000; SD_S = 67082.04; CV_S = 0.4472

Common errors

  • Scaling the standard deviation of total claims with group size

    Multiplying the per-member standard deviation by the number of members gives 15,000 × 200 = 3,000,000 dollars for Employer 1 instead of about $212,132. The attachment point would then lie only 0.125 standard deviations above expected claims, and a normal approximation would put the chance of reaching it near 0.45 rather than 0.0385.

  • Assuming independence when claims share common shocks

    Real pools are finite and members' claims can move together, for example in an epidemic or a high-utilisation year. The square-root rule then overstates how much pooling narrows the distribution, so a large group's protection from aggregate stop-loss looks less valuable than it is.

Sources

  • Arrow on pooling independent medical risks

    Arrow KJ. Uncertainty and the welfare economics of medical care. American Economic Review. 1963;53(5):941-973. Section IV.B: under the assumption that medical risks on different individuals are independent, pooling them reduces the risk to the insurer to relatively small proportions, with the caveat that pools are finite and risks may be interdependent through epidemics.

    View source →

Canonical Identity