Indirect odds ratio and 95% interval from the log scale

Back-transforms an indirect log odds ratio and its variance into an odds ratio with a 95% confidence interval. The interval is built symmetrically on the log scale and becomes asymmetric on the odds ratio scale. The function exp is the exponential function and sqrt the square root.

Signature

OR_BC = exp(d_BC); OR_BC_L = exp(d_BC - 1.96 * sqrt(V_BC)); OR_BC_U = exp(d_BC + 1.96 * sqrt(V_BC))
Inputs
InputsDefinitionUnit
d_BCIndirect log odds ratio of C relative to Blog odds ratio
V_BCVariance of d_BCsquared log odds ratio
Output
OR_BCOdds ratio for C compared with B from the indirect comparisonratio, no unit
OR_BC_LLower limit of the 95% confidence interval for OR_BCratio, no unit
OR_BC_UUpper limit of the 95% confidence interval for OR_BCratio, no unit

Function

Network consistency function

Expresses every pairwise relative effect in a connected network through effects relative to a common reference treatment A, on a scale where effects add, such as the log odds ratio. Here d_XY is the effect of Y relative to X, the NICE Decision Support Unit convention. Consistency is the assumption that direct and indirect evidence estimate the same d_XY.

Implementations

  • Excel

    Indirect odds ratio and limits in three cells

    With the indirect log odds ratio in dBC and its variance in VBC, the three formulas return the odds ratio and its 95% limits.

    =EXP(dBC); =EXP(dBC-1.96*SQRT(VBC)); =EXP(dBC+1.96*SQRT(VBC))

Assumptions

  • Approximate normality on the log scale

    The indirect log odds ratio is approximately normally distributed, so a 95% interval is the estimate plus or minus 1.96 standard errors on the log scale.

Worked examples

  • Back-transforming the TSD 4 indirect estimate

    An indirect log odds ratio of minus 1.37 with variance 0.4292 gives an odds ratio of about 0.2541 with a 95% confidence interval of about 0.0704 to 0.9177.

    d_BC = -1.37; V_BC = 0.4292; OR_BC = 0.2541; OR_BC_L = 0.0704; OR_BC_U = 0.9177
  • Back-transforming the placebo-anchored example

    An indirect log odds ratio of minus 0.3364 with variance 0.0625 gives an odds ratio of about 0.7143 with a 95% confidence interval of about 0.4376 to 1.1660, so the indirect evidence is compatible with no difference between B and C.

    d_BC = -0.3364; V_BC = 0.0625; OR_BC = 0.7143; OR_BC_L = 0.4376; OR_BC_U = 1.1660

Common errors

  • Building the interval on the odds ratio scale

    Adding and subtracting 1.96 standard errors to an odds ratio gives a symmetric interval that can include negative values. The interval is built on the log scale and exponentiated.

Sources

  • Indirect odds ratio with a confidence interval

    Bucher HC, Guyatt GH, Griffith LE, Walter SD. The results of direct and indirect treatment comparisons in meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology. 1997;50(6):683-691. The indirect comparison is reported as an odds ratio with a 95% confidence interval (0.37, 0.21 to 0.65, in the Pneumocystis prophylaxis example).

    View source →

Canonical Identity

Stable URI · Machine-readable · Resolvable · CC BY 4.0

Indirect odds ratio and 95% interval from the log scale | HealthEconomics.wiki