Incremental net monetary benefit

Calculates the difference in net monetary benefit between an intervention and its comparator at threshold lambda. A positive value favours the intervention in every quadrant of the cost-effectiveness plane.

Signature

INMB = lambda * Delta_E - Delta_C
Inputs
InputsDefinitionUnit
lambdaMonetary value placed on one unit of health effectcurrency per unit of health effect, for example £ per QALY
Delta_EExpected health effect of the intervention minus that of the comparatorhealth-outcome unit per defined population or person
Delta_CExpected cost of the intervention minus that of the comparatorcurrency per defined population or person
Output
INMBNet monetary benefit of the intervention minus that of the comparator at threshold lambdacurrency per defined population or person

Function

Net monetary benefit function

Values an option's expected health effect in money at a stated cost-effectiveness threshold and subtracts its expected cost, placing health and cost on one monetary scale.

Try this function

Implementations

  • Excel

    Calculate incremental NMB

    Excel values the incremental effect at the threshold and subtracts the incremental cost.

    =Threshold*IncrementalEffect-IncrementalCost

Assumptions

  • Consistent subtraction direction for INMB

    Delta_E and Delta_C both take the intervention minus the comparator, so INMB equals the intervention's NMB minus the comparator's NMB.

  • Equivalence with the ICER rule

    When Delta_E is greater than zero, INMB is positive exactly when the ICER is below lambda. When Delta_E is negative the ICER rule reverses while the INMB rule does not, and when Delta_E equals zero only INMB is defined.

Worked examples

  • Positive INMB at £20,000 per QALY

    Incremental cost is £4,000 and incremental effect is 0.30 QALYs. At £20,000 per QALY the INMB is £2,000, the difference between the option-level NMBs of £82,000 and £80,000. The ICER of about £13,333 per QALY is below £20,000, so both rules favour the intervention. The figures are illustrative.

    lambda = 20000; Delta_E = 0.30; Delta_C = 4000; INMB = 2000
  • Negative INMB at a lower threshold

    At an illustrative threshold of £10,000 per QALY the same comparison gives an INMB of minus £1,000, so current care has the higher NMB. The INMB changes sign at about £13,333 per QALY, the ICER.

    lambda = 10000; Delta_E = 0.30; Delta_C = 4000; INMB = -1000

Common errors

  • Applying the ICER rule when Delta_E is negative

    In the south-west quadrant an ICER below lambda means that the savings per QALY forgone are too small, so reading it as favourable reverses the conclusion that INMB gives directly.

  • Reading a positive INMB as affordability

    INMB compares value at a threshold and says nothing about budget impact or the final adoption decision.

Sources

  • Net benefit expressed in money

    Tambour M, Zethraeus N, Johannesson M. A note on confidence intervals in cost-effectiveness analysis. International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care. 1998;14(3):467-471.

    View source →

  • Net health benefit framework

    Stinnett AA, Mullahy J. Net health benefits: a new framework for the analysis of uncertainty in cost-effectiveness analysis. Medical Decision Making. 1998;18(2 Suppl):S68-S80.

    View source →

Canonical Identity

Stable URI · Machine-readable · Resolvable · CC BY 4.0

Incremental net monetary benefit | HealthEconomics.wiki