VerifiedEvidence: highv1.0.0

Delayed Entry

A survival analysis situation in which an individual is only observed from some point later than a common natural starting point, such as diagnosis.

Last reviewedDarrin Baines IP Ltd

Concept Architecture

Concept


Theoretically, Delayed Entry is a survival analysis concept in which individuals enter the risk set after the formal origin of the study time scale rather than at time zero. Also known as left truncation, delayed entry occurs when participants become observable only after surviving to a later entry time. The concept is founded on survival analysis and counting process theory. It exists to ensure that only individuals who are genuinely at risk and under observation contribute to estimation of survival probabilities and hazard functions.

Mathematically, Delayed Entry is represented by defining separate entry and exit times for each individual. An individual contributes to the likelihood only after their entry time and remains in the risk set until the event of interest or censoring. Likelihood functions, Kaplan?Meier estimators and Cox proportional hazards models are modified so that risk sets include only individuals satisfying the delayed entry criterion at each event time.

In practice, Delayed Entry is incorporated into survival datasets by recording both the time of study entry and the time of event or censoring. Statistical software automatically constructs the appropriate risk sets for estimation of survival functions and hazard ratios. Delayed entry commonly occurs in registry studies, longitudinal cohort studies and health technology assessments where participants enter observation after diagnosis, treatment initiation or another qualifying event.


Purpose


Used to account for participants entering observation after the start of the study time scale, ensuring valid estimation of survival functions and treatment effects by constructing appropriate risk sets.


Mathematical Formulae

Primary Formula

Observed follow-up interval:

L? < T? � C?

where:

  • L? = delayed entry (left truncation) time
  • T? = event time
  • C? = censoring time

Supporting Formulae

Risk set at time t:

R(t) = {i : L? � t < T?}

Partial likelihood for the Cox proportional hazards model:

L(?) = ? exp(??X?) / ???R(t?) exp(??X?)

where R(t?) is the delayed-entry risk set at event time t?.

Related Mathematical Methods

  • Left Truncation
  • Survival Analysis
  • Kaplan?Meier Estimation
  • Cox Proportional Hazards Model
  • Partial Likelihood Estimation
  • Counting Process Models
  • Maximum Likelihood Estimation

Example


A cancer registry follows patients from diagnosis, but only those alive when the registry was established are enrolled. One patient is diagnosed at month 0, enters the registry at month 18 and dies at month 42. The participant therefore enters the risk set at 18 months and contributes survival information only between months 18 and 42. Failure to account for delayed entry would overestimate survival because individuals who died before registry enrolment would be excluded.


Excel Implementation

FunctionExample FormulaHealth Economics Application
MAX=MAX(Entry_Time,Analysis_Start)Determine the effective start of follow-up.
IF=IF(Event_Time>=Entry_Time,1,0)Verify valid delayed-entry observations.
MIN=MIN(Event_Time,Censor_Time)Calculate observed exit time.
DAYS=DAYS(Exit_Date,Entry_Date)Calculate follow-up duration after delayed entry.
FILTER=FILTER(A2:E1000,B2:B1000<=Analysis_Time)Identify individuals eligible for the risk set at a specified time.

VBA (Optional)


VBA can automate construction of delayed-entry survival datasets by generating entry times, exit times and time-specific risk sets for survival analyses.


Sources

  • Klein JP, Moeschberger ML. Survival Analysis: Techniques for Censored and Truncated Data.
  • Therneau TM, Grambsch PM. Modeling Survival Data: Extending the Cox Model.
  • Kalbfleisch JD, Prentice RL. The Statistical Analysis of Failure Time Data.
  • Andersen PK, Borgan ?, Gill RD, Keiding N. Statistical Models Based on Counting Processes.
  • NICE. Health Technology Evaluation Manual.
  • Briggs A, Claxton K, Sculpher M. Decision Modelling for Health Economic Evaluation.

Library

Publications

1
  • Journal article

    Good Practices for Real-World Data Studies of Treatment and/or Comparative Effectiveness: Recommendations from the Joint ISPOR-ISPE Special Task Force on Real-World Evidence in Health Care Decision Making — Berger, Sox, Willke, Brixner, Eichler, Goettsch, Madigan, Makady, Schneeweiss, Tarricone, Wang, Watkins & Mullins, Vol. 20, No. 8 ed., 2017 (Value in Health)

    The joint ISPOR-ISPE recommendations on good procedural practice for real-world data studies (observational studies and registries) used to inform healthcare decisions — study registration, replicability and stakeholder involvement — the reference for RWE credibility in HTA.

Frequently Asked Questions (6)

  • What is delayed entry?

    A survival analysis situation in which an individual is only observed from some point later than a common natural starting point, such as diagnosis.

    Source: Kalbfleisch & Prentice 2002

  • Why does delayed entry require special handling in survival analysis?

    Delayed entry occurs when patients come under observation only some time after the natural start of the clock, such as diagnosis, so they contribute no information about the interval before they entered. Treating them as at risk from the natural start would be wrong, because they had to survive event-free to enter at all, which would bias the estimated risk downward for early times. Survival methods handle this by counting each patient as at risk only from their actual entry. The unobserved early period must be excluded. Collett (2015) describes this.

    Source: Collett 2015

  • How does delayed entry arise?

    Delayed entry arises when individuals begin being observed after the natural time origin for survival, for instance when a study enrols patients some time after their diagnosis, when people join a registry after developing a condition, or when eligibility depends on surviving to a certain point. In each case, follow-up starts later than the origin from which survival is measured, so the individual is not observed, or at risk in the analysis, during the interval between the origin and their entry. This late start creates delayed entry.

    Source: Kalbfleisch & Prentice 2002

  • How is delayed entry handled in survival analysis?

    Delayed entry is handled by including individuals in the risk set only from the time they actually enter observation, rather than from the time origin, so that they contribute to the analysis only over the period they are observed and at risk. This is done through methods that account for left truncation, adjusting the risk set at each event time to include only those already under observation. Handling delayed entry correctly avoids bias, since counting individuals as at risk before they were observed, or excluding them entirely, would distort the survival estimates.

    Source: Collett 2015

  • Why must delayed entry be accounted for?

    Delayed entry must be accounted for because individuals who enter late were, by definition, event-free and surviving up to their entry, so including them as at risk from the time origin would wrongly credit them with survival time not actually observed, while ignoring the late start could bias estimates. Only counting them at risk from their actual entry gives valid results. Because those with delayed entry had to survive to enter, failing to handle this can bias survival estimates, so proper adjustment for the delayed entry is important for valid analysis.

    Source: Kalbfleisch & Prentice 2002

  • How does delayed entry relate to left truncation?

    Delayed entry relates closely to left truncation: left truncation occurs when individuals are only included in a study if they survive to a certain point, and delayed entry is the corresponding situation in which observation begins after the time origin. Both mean that individuals are observed only from a point later than the natural start, and both are handled by adjusting the risk set to include individuals only from when they enter observation. So delayed entry and left truncation describe the same phenomenon of late observation, requiring the same analytic treatment to avoid bias.

    Source: Kalbfleisch & Prentice 2002

Trust Record

Verified by Dr Darrin Baines

British health economist

Professional identity: darrinbaines.org

Verification date: 13 Nov 2025

Content version: 1.0.0

Canonical Identity

Term code
HE-ES-CTM-025

Stable URI · Machine-readable · Resolvable · CC BY 4.0