VerifiedEvidence: highv1.0.0

Single Attribute Utility

A utility value derived from a single dimension of health or outcome, unlike multi-attribute utility, which integrates several dimensions.

Last reviewedDarrin Baines IP Ltd

Concept Architecture

Concept


Theoretically, Single Attribute Utility is a utility representation in which preferences are defined over variations in one attribute while all other relevant attributes are held constant. It is grounded in expected utility theory and multi-attribute utility theory, where individual attributes such as pain, mobility or survival are assigned utility functions reflecting the decision-maker?s preferences. In health economics, single attribute utility functions are used as components of broader multi-attribute health utility models and decision-analytic evaluations.

Mathematically, a single attribute utility function maps each feasible level of an attribute x to a utility value u(x), commonly bounded between 0 and 1. The functional form may be linear, concave or convex depending on the individual?s attitude towards changes in the attribute. Parameters are estimated using preference elicitation methods such as standard gamble, time trade-off, rating scales or certainty-equivalent tasks.

In practice, respondents evaluate different levels of a single health or treatment attribute while other conditions remain fixed. The resulting preference data are used to estimate a utility function, which may then be incorporated into an additive or multiplicative multi-attribute utility model. Applications include valuing treatment convenience, symptom severity, adverse-event risk and dimensions of health-related quality of life.


Purpose


Used to quantify preferences over different levels of one health-related attribute and to provide a component utility function for multi-attribute decision and health valuation models.


Mathematical Formulae

Primary Formula

u = u(x)

with normalisation:

u(xworst) = 0

u(xbest) = 1

Supporting Formulae

Linear utility function:

u(x) = (x ? xworst) / (xbest ? xworst)

Exponential utility function:

u(x) = [1 ? exp(?�(x ? xworst))] / [1 ? exp(?�(xbest ? xworst))]

Additive multi-attribute utility model:

U(x?, ..., x?) = ?k?u?(x?)

where:

  • k? = scaling constant for attribute i
  • u?(x?) = single attribute utility function

Related Mathematical Methods

  • Expected Utility Theory
  • Multi-Attribute Utility Theory
  • Standard Gamble
  • Time Trade-Off
  • Utility Function Estimation
  • Preference Elicitation

Example


Pain severity is measured on a scale from 0, representing no pain, to 10, representing the worst possible pain. Utility is defined so that no pain has utility 1 and the worst pain has utility 0.

For a linear single attribute utility function:

u(x) = 1 ? x / 10

For pain severity x = 4:

u(4) = 1 ? 4 / 10 = 0.60

The estimated utility of 0.60 can be incorporated into a broader multi-attribute model describing treatment outcomes.


Excel Implementation

FunctionExample FormulaHealth Economics Application
LET=LET(x,B2,Worst,$B$10,Best,$B$11,(x-Worst)/(Best-Worst))Calculates a normalised linear single attribute utility.
EXP=(1-EXP(-$F$1*(B2-$B$10)))/(1-EXP(-$F$1*($B$11-$B$10)))Calculates an exponential utility function.
SUMPRODUCT=SUMPRODUCT(WeightRange,UtilityRange)Combines single attribute utilities in an additive utility model.
MAX=MAX(0,MIN(1,C2))Restricts estimated utility values to the interval from 0 to 1.
XLOOKUP=XLOOKUP(B2,AttributeLevelRange,UtilityValueRange)Retrieves an empirically elicited utility for a specified attribute level.

VBA (Optional)


VBA can automate estimation and application of single attribute utility functions across respondents, attributes and health states.


Sources

  • von Neumann J, Morgenstern O. Theory of Games and Economic Behavior. Princeton University Press.
  • Keeney RL, Raiffa H. Decisions with Multiple Objectives: Preferences and Value Trade-Offs. Cambridge University Press.
  • Torrance GW, Feeny D, Furlong W. Visual analog scales: do they have a role in the measurement of preferences for health states? Medical Decision Making.
  • Brazier J, Ratcliffe J, Salomon JA, Tsuchiya A. Measuring and Valuing Health Benefits for Economic Evaluation. Oxford University Press.
  • Drummond MF, Sculpher MJ, Claxton K, Stoddart GL, Torrance GW. Methods for the Economic Evaluation of Health Care Programmes. Oxford University Press.

Library

Publications

1
  • BookFeatured

    Measuring and Valuing Health Benefits for Economic Evaluation — Brazier, Ratcliffe, Salomon & Tsuchiya, 2nd Edition ed., 2017 (Oxford University Press)

    The comprehensive text on the measurement and valuation of health benefits for economic evaluation — defining health, valuation techniques (time trade-off, standard gamble), whose values to use, preference-based measures (EQ-5D, SF-6D), and the construction of QALYs.

Frequently Asked Questions (6)

  • What is single-attribute utility?

    A utility value derived from a single dimension of health or outcome, unlike multi-attribute utility, which integrates several dimensions.

    Source: Torrance GW. Measurement of health state utilities for economic appraisal. Journal of Health Economics. 1986;5(1):1-30. doi:10.1016/0167-6296(86)90020-2.

  • What is an example of single-attribute utility in health?

    A single-attribute utility function values just one dimension of an outcome. In health, an example is a utility scale for level of vision alone, or for degree of mobility, giving the desirability of each level of that one attribute without regard to any other. Such functions are often the building blocks from which a multi-attribute measure is later assembled, since each attribute is first valued on its own. Taken alone, a single-attribute function ignores everything outside its one dimension. Torrance and colleagues (1996) used single-attribute functions in constructing health indices.

    Source: Torrance et al. 1996

  • How is a single-attribute utility function derived?

    A single-attribute utility function is derived by valuing the levels of one dimension against each other, placing them on a scale from the best to the worst level of that attribute, using methods such as the standard gamble or time trade-off applied to that dimension. The result gives the utility of each level of the single attribute. These functions are then combined, with weights reflecting the attributes' relative importance, to build a multi-attribute utility.

    Source: Torrance 1986

  • How does single-attribute utility relate to multi-attribute utility?

    Single-attribute utilities value each dimension separately, and multi-attribute utility combines them into one overall value using a function that weights the attributes and specifies how they interact. The single-attribute functions describe the value of levels within each dimension, while the multi-attribute function aggregates across dimensions. Constructing a multi-attribute utility instrument therefore involves first establishing single-attribute utilities and then a combining function, so the single-attribute values are components of the whole.

    Source: Torrance 1986

  • When is single-attribute utility used?

    Single-attribute utility is used where a health outcome is adequately captured by one dimension, or as a step in building a multi-attribute measure, where each attribute's utility is established before the attributes are combined. It suits problems in which a single aspect of health, such as a particular symptom, is the concern. Where health has several relevant dimensions, however, a multi-attribute utility that integrates them is needed to represent the overall state.

    Source: Torrance 1986

  • What are the limitations of single-attribute utility?

    Single-attribute utility captures only one dimension of health, so it cannot represent a state affecting several dimensions, and it ignores how the value of one attribute may depend on the levels of others. Reducing health to a single attribute risks omitting important aspects of a condition. For most health states, which involve more than one dimension, single-attribute utility is insufficient on its own, which is why multi-attribute utility is used to integrate the dimensions.

    Source: Torrance 1986

Trust Record

Verified by Dr Darrin Baines

British health economist

Professional identity: darrinbaines.org

Verification date: 2 Sep 2025

Content version: 1.0.0

Canonical Identity

Term code
HE-EE-HU-072

Stable URI · Machine-readable · Resolvable · CC BY 4.0