VerifiedEvidence: highv1.0.0

Mapping Function

The specific statistical relationship, typically estimated through regression, used within a mapping algorithm to convert a health status score into a predicted utility value.

Last reviewedDarrin Baines IP Ltd

Concept Architecture

Concept

Theoretically, Mapping Function is the mathematical relationship that transforms scores from a non-preference-based health outcome measure into predicted preference-based utility values. It represents the functional form of a mapping algorithm rather than the statistical procedure used to estimate it. The concept is founded on statistical prediction theory and exists to enable estimation of health utilities when direct preference-based measurements are unavailable.

Mathematically, mapping functions have no universally recognised canonical mathematical formula. They are expressed as fitted predictive equations in which utility is modelled as a function of one or more explanatory variables derived from the source instrument. The functional form depends on the selected statistical model and the estimated model parameters.

In practice, mapping functions are derived from datasets containing both the source instrument and a preference-based measure such as EQ-5D. Once validated, the published function is applied to independent datasets to predict health state utility values for quality-adjusted life year estimation, economic evaluation and health technology assessment. Predictive performance is evaluated using recognised goodness-of-fit and prediction error statistics.


Purpose

Used to convert scores from non-preference-based health outcome measures into predicted preference-based utility values for cost-utility analysis when direct utility measurement is unavailable.


Mathematical Formulae

Primary Formula

There is no universally recognised canonical mathematical formula.

Supporting Formulae

U? = f(X; ??)

where:

  • U? = predicted health utility
  • X = predictor variable or vector of predictor variables
  • ?? = estimated model parameters
  • f(�) = fitted mapping function

For a linear mapping function:

U? = ?? + ????? ??X?

Related Mathematical Methods

  • Regression modelling
  • Ordinary least squares regression
  • Generalised linear models
  • Beta regression
  • Response mapping
  • Cross-validation
  • Root mean squared error (RMSE)
  • Mean absolute error (MAE)

Example

A published mapping function predicts EQ-5D utility from a disease-specific questionnaire:

U? = 0.91 ? 0.018(Disease Score)

For a patient with a disease score of 15:

U? = 0.91 ? 0.018 ? 15 = 0.640

The predicted utility value of 0.640 is subsequently used to estimate QALYs in a cost-utility analysis.


Excel Implementation

FunctionExample FormulaHealth Economics Application
SUMPRODUCT=SUMPRODUCT(B2:F2,$B$1:$F$1)+$A$1Applies a published mapping function to predict utility values.
LINEST=LINEST(Y2:Y201,B2:F201,TRUE,TRUE)Estimates coefficients when developing a mapping function.
SQRT=SQRT(AVERAGE((Y2:Y201-Z2:Z201)^2))Calculates RMSE to evaluate predictive performance.
ABS=ABS(Y2-Z2)Calculates absolute prediction error for model validation.

VBA (Optional)

Automate the application of validated mapping functions to patient datasets and generate predicted utility values with model validation statistics.


Sources

  • Wailoo AJ, Hernandez-Alava M, Manca A, et al. Mapping to Estimate Health-State Utility from Non-Preference-Based Outcome Measures: An ISPOR Good Practices for Outcomes Research Task Force Report. Value in Health. 2017.
  • Drummond MF, Sculpher MJ, Claxton K, Stoddart GL, Torrance GW. Methods for the Economic Evaluation of Health Care Programmes. Oxford University Press.
  • Briggs A, Claxton K, Sculpher M. Decision Modelling for Health Economic Evaluation. Oxford University Press.
  • NICE. Health Technology Evaluation Manual.
  • Brazier J, Ratcliffe J, Salomon JA, Tsuchiya A. Measuring and Valuing Health Benefits for Economic Evaluation. Oxford University Press.

Library

Publications

1
  • BookFeatured

    Measuring and Valuing Health Benefits for Economic Evaluation — Brazier, Ratcliffe, Salomon & Tsuchiya, 2nd Edition ed., 2017 (Oxford University Press)

    The comprehensive text on the measurement and valuation of health benefits for economic evaluation — defining health, valuation techniques (time trade-off, standard gamble), whose values to use, preference-based measures (EQ-5D, SF-6D), and the construction of QALYs.

Frequently Asked Questions (6)

  • What is a mapping function?

    The specific statistical relationship, typically estimated through regression, used within a mapping algorithm to convert a health status score into a predicted utility value.

    Source: Longworth & Rowen 2013

  • What is the outcome variable in a mapping function?

    The variable a mapping function predicts is the preference-based utility value, most often the index score from a measure such as the EQ-5D, treated as the dependent variable in a regression. The predictors are the scores or item responses from the non-preference instrument collected in the study. Because utility scores are bounded and often cluster near full health, the choice of statistical form for this dependent variable strongly affects how well the function performs. Brazier and colleagues (2010) discuss modelling the utility outcome in mapping.

    Source: Brazier et al. 2010

  • How is a mapping function estimated?

    A mapping function is estimated by fitting a statistical model to data in which the same respondents completed both a non-preference-based instrument and a preference-based measure, relating the source scores to the utilities. Regression models of various forms are used, chosen to fit the relationship and to respect the bounded, often skewed distribution of utilities. The fitted function is then used to predict utilities from source scores in other data. Its form and fit determine the predictions.

    Source: Longworth & Rowen 2013

  • What forms can a mapping function take?

    A mapping function can take various regression forms, from simple linear models predicting utility from the source instrument's total score, to models using the individual dimension or item responses, to methods that respect the bounded and clustered distribution of utility values, such as models for limited dependent variables or mixture models. The choice of form affects accuracy, particularly at the extremes of health, and is selected to fit the data and the shape of the utility distribution.

    Source: Longworth & Rowen 2013

  • What determines the quality of a mapping function?

    The quality of a mapping function depends on how strongly the source instrument's content overlaps with the health that the preference-based measure values, since it can only predict from shared information, and on the size and representativeness of the estimation sample. A well-fitting function on data covering the full range of health predicts better than one from a narrow sample. Its performance is judged by predictive accuracy, especially at the extremes where mapping often struggles.

    Source: Longworth & Rowen 2013

  • How does a mapping function relate to a mapping algorithm?

    The mapping function is the statistical relationship at the heart of a mapping algorithm: the algorithm is the overall procedure for predicting utilities from a non-preference-based instrument, and the function is the specific fitted equation it applies. The terms are often used interchangeably, but the function refers to the estimated relationship while the algorithm refers to its application to generate utilities. The function's form and fit determine the utilities the algorithm produces.

    Source: Longworth & Rowen 2013

Trust Record

Verified by Dr Darrin Baines

British health economist

Professional identity: darrinbaines.org

Verification date: 1 Sep 2025

Content version: 1.0.0

Canonical Identity

Term code
HE-EE-HU-047

Stable URI · Machine-readable · Resolvable · CC BY 4.0