Concept Architecture
Concept
Theoretically, Concentration Index is a rank-dependent measure of socioeconomic inequality in a health variable. It quantifies the extent to which health outcomes, healthcare utilisation, healthcare expenditure or other health-related quantities are concentrated among individuals with lower or higher socioeconomic status. The index is derived from the concentration curve and combines information about the health variable with the socioeconomic ranking of the population. A value of zero indicates no socioeconomic-related inequality, while the sign identifies the direction of concentration.
Mathematically, the Concentration Index is defined as twice the covariance between the health variable and the individual?s fractional socioeconomic rank, divided by the mean of the health variable. Equivalently, it is twice the area between the concentration curve and the line of equality. For a non-negative, unbounded health variable, the index conventionally ranges from ?1 to 1, although the attainable bounds depend on the distribution and measurement scale of the outcome. Corrections may therefore be required for bounded or binary variables.
In practice, individuals are ranked from the least to the most socioeconomically advantaged, fractional ranks are calculated, and the Concentration Index is estimated using covariance, weighted regression or grouped-data methods. Sampling uncertainty is assessed using analytical standard errors, bootstrap procedures or survey-design-adjusted estimation. In health economics, the index is used to evaluate inequalities in health, healthcare use, healthcare financing, treatment uptake and public expenditure.
Purpose
Used to quantify the magnitude and direction of socioeconomic-related inequality in health outcomes, healthcare utilisation, expenditure and financing, supporting equity assessment and comparison across populations, interventions and time periods.
Mathematical Formulae
Primary Formula
C = 2Cov(y, R) / ?
where:
- C = Concentration Index
- y = health variable
- R = fractional socioeconomic rank
- ? = mean of the health variable
Supporting Formulae
Fractional rank for unweighted observations:
R? = (i ? 0.5) / n
Discrete formulation:
C = (2 / (n?)) ? ?? y?R? ? 1
Concentration-curve formulation:
C = 1 ? 2 ? ??? L(p) dp
Convenient regression:
2��? ? (y? / ?) = � + ?R? + �?
C = ?
Erreygers correction for a bounded variable:
E = 4?C / (ymax ? ymin)
Related Mathematical Methods
- Concentration Curve
- Covariance
- Fractional Rank
- Lorenz Curve
- Gini Coefficient
- Wagstaff Normalisation
- Erreygers Correction
- Dominance Testing
- Decomposition of the Concentration Index
Example
Five patients are ranked from the lowest to the highest household income. Their annual outpatient visits are 8, 6, 4, 2 and 0. Their fractional income ranks are 0.1, 0.3, 0.5, 0.7 and 0.9.
The mean number of visits is:
? = (8 + 6 + 4 + 2 + 0) / 5
= 4
The covariance between outpatient visits and fractional income rank is:
Cov(y, R) = ?0.8
The Concentration Index is:
C = 2 ? (?0.8) / 4
= ?0.40
The negative value indicates that outpatient visits are disproportionately concentrated among patients with lower household incomes.
Excel Implementation
| Function | Example Formula | Health Economics Application |
|---|---|---|
| SORTBY | =SORTBY(A2:B1001,A2:A1001,1) | Sort individuals from the lowest to the highest socioeconomic position. |
| RANK.AVG | =(RANK.AVG(A2,$A$2:$A$1001,1)-0.5)/COUNT($A$2:$A$1001) | Calculate the fractional socioeconomic rank for each individual. |
| COVARIANCE.P | =2*COVARIANCE.P(B2:B1001,C2:C1001)/AVERAGE(B2:B1001) | Calculate the Concentration Index from the health variable and fractional ranks. |
| SUMPRODUCT | =2*SUMPRODUCT(B2:B1001,C2:C1001)/(COUNT(B2:B1001)*AVERAGE(B2:B1001))-1 | Calculate the unweighted discrete Concentration Index directly from ranked observations. |
| SUM | =SUM(B$2:B2)/SUM($B$2:$B$1001) | Calculate cumulative health shares for the associated concentration curve. |
VBA (Optional)
Automate socioeconomic ranking, Concentration Index estimation, correction for bounded outcomes and production of equity-analysis summary tables.
Sources
- Wagstaff A, Paci P, van Doorslaer E. On the measurement of inequalities in health. Social Science & Medicine. 1991;33(5):545?557.
- Kakwani N, Wagstaff A, van Doorslaer E. Socioeconomic inequalities in health: Measurement, computation and statistical inference. Journal of Econometrics. 1997;77(1):87?103.
- Wagstaff A. The bounds of the Concentration Index when the variable of interest is binary, with an application to immunisation inequality. Health Economics. 2005;14(4):429?432.
- Erreygers G. Correcting the Concentration Index. Journal of Health Economics. 2009;28(2):504?515.
- O'Donnell O, van Doorslaer E, Wagstaff A, Lindelow M. Analyzing Health Equity Using Household Survey Data. World Bank.
Related Concepts (2)
Library
Publications
2
Distributional Cost-Effectiveness Analysis: Quantifying Health Equity Impacts and Trade-Offs — Cookson, Griffin, Norheim & Culyer, 1st Edition ed., 2020 (Oxford University Press)
The definitive practical guide to distributional cost-effectiveness analysis (DCEA), a suite of methods for quantifying who gains and who loses from health programmes and the trade-offs between improving total health and reducing unfair health inequality. Volume 7 in the Handbooks in Health Economic Evaluation series.
BookView source →Fair Society, Healthy Lives: The Marmot Review (Strategic Review of Health Inequalities in England Post-2010) — Michael Marmot, Peter Goldblatt, Jessica Allen, et al., 2010 Edition ed., 2010 (The Marmot Review / UCL Institute of Health Equity)
The landmark strategic review of health inequalities in England, articulating the social determinants of health and the "social gradient" and setting out six policy objectives for reducing inequalities — the defining reference for health-inequalities policy in the UK.
Media
2
Amartya Sen — Portrait (Wikimedia Commons) — Wikimedia Commons contributors, Openly licensed (see file page) ed., 2012 (Wikimedia Commons)
Openly-licensed portraits of Amartya Sen, Nobel laureate whose capability approach and work on welfare, equity and social choice underpin distributional and equity analysis in health economics. Each image on the category page carries its own open licence.
Image (Wikimedia Commons)View source →Angus Deaton — Portrait (Wikimedia Commons) — Wikimedia Commons contributors, Openly licensed (see file page) ed., 2015 (Wikimedia Commons)
Openly-licensed images of Sir Angus Deaton, Nobel laureate known for work on health, wellbeing, inequality and the measurement of welfare across populations. Each image on the category page carries its own open licence.
Image (Wikimedia Commons)View source →
Frequently Asked Questions (6)
What is a concentration index?
A summary measure of socioeconomic health inequality derived from the concentration curve, ranging from negative one to positive one.
Source: O'Donnell et al. 2008
What does a concentration index summarise in a single number?
A concentration index summarises socioeconomic inequality in a health variable as a single number derived from the concentration curve, running from negative one to positive one. Its sign shows which end of the income range the variable concentrates in, and its size how unequal the distribution is, with zero meaning no income-related inequality. This condenses the whole concentration curve into one comparable figure, useful for tracking inequality over time or between places. Reducing health inequality to one number is what it does. O'Donnell and colleagues (2008) set out its use.
Source: O'Donnell et al. 2008
What does a concentration index measure?
A concentration index measures the degree of socioeconomic inequality in a health variable, quantifying how much it is concentrated among poorer or richer groups, on a scale from negative one to positive one. So a concentration index measures socioeconomic health inequality, which is why it has a range, since the value indicates the direction and degree of concentration, and measuring how a health variable is distributed by socioeconomic status in a single number allows the inequality shown by the concentration curve to be quantified and compared.
Source: O'Donnell et al. 2008
How is a concentration index interpreted?
A concentration index is interpreted by its sign and magnitude: a negative value indicates the variable is concentrated among poorer groups, a positive value among richer groups, and zero indicates equal distribution, with larger magnitude meaning greater inequality. So a concentration index is interpreted by sign and size, which is why it ranges from negative one to positive one, since the sign shows the direction of concentration and the magnitude the degree, and interpreting the index reveals whether a health variable favours poorer or richer groups and how unequally it is distributed.
Source: O'Donnell et al. 2008
Why is a concentration index used?
A concentration index is used to summarise socioeconomic health inequality in a single number, allowing the inequality to be quantified and compared across variables, populations, or time. So a concentration index is used to quantify and compare inequality, which is why it is a summary measure, since a single figure allows comparison that a graph alone does not, and using a concentration index provides a numerical measure of how unequally a health variable is distributed by socioeconomic status, supporting the assessment and comparison of health inequality.
Source: O'Donnell et al. 2008
How does a concentration index relate to a concentration curve?
A concentration index relates to a concentration curve in that it is derived from the curve: the concentration curve depicts the distribution graphically and the concentration index summarises it as a number. So the concentration index summarises the concentration curve, which is why they are connected, since the curve shows the socioeconomic distribution and the index quantifies it, and the concentration index is calculated from the concentration curve, providing a single measure of the inequality the curve displays, linking the graphical depiction to its numerical summary.
Source: O'Donnell et al. 2008
Trust Record
Verified by Dr Darrin Baines
British health economist
Professional identity: darrinbaines.org
Verification date: 31 Dec 2025
Content version: 1.0.0
Canonical Identity
- Persistent URI
- https://healtheconomics.wiki/concept/concentration-index
- Term code
- HS-HP-HE-011
Stable URI · Machine-readable · Resolvable · CC BY 4.0