Concept Architecture
Concept
Theoretically, Bayesian Optimisation is a sequential optimisation method for identifying the optimum of an objective function that is expensive to evaluate, stochastic or lacks an analytical form. It combines Bayesian statistical inference with decision theory to iteratively update beliefs about the objective function and determine where subsequent evaluations should be performed. In health economics, Bayesian optimisation is used to calibrate complex decision models, estimate model parameters and optimise resource allocation when repeated model evaluations are computationally intensive.
Mathematically, Bayesian optimisation represents the unknown objective function using a probabilistic surrogate model, most commonly a Gaussian process. After each function evaluation, Bayes' theorem is used to update the posterior distribution of the objective function. An acquisition function balances exploration of uncertain regions with exploitation of promising solutions by selecting the next evaluation point that maximises the expected improvement or another optimisation criterion.
In practice, Bayesian optimisation is implemented by defining an objective function, specifying prior distributions for the surrogate model, selecting an acquisition function and sequentially updating the posterior as additional model evaluations are performed. It is applied in health economic model calibration, parameter estimation, simulation optimisation, machine learning and computational decision modelling where conventional optimisation methods would require excessive computational time.
Purpose
Used to efficiently optimise computationally expensive health economic models by sequentially selecting parameter values that maximise model performance while minimising the number of model evaluations.
Mathematical Formulae
Primary Formula
Bayesian posterior distribution:
p(f ? D) = [p(D ? f) p(f)] / p(D)
where:
- f = unknown objective function
- D = observed evaluations
- p(f) = prior distribution
- p(D ? f) = likelihood
- p(f ? D) = posterior distribution
Supporting Formulae
Expected Improvement acquisition function:
EI(x) = E[max(f(x) ? f(x?), 0)]
where:
- x = candidate evaluation point
- f(x?) = current best objective value
Related Mathematical Methods
- Gaussian process regression
- Bayesian inference
- Sequential optimisation
- Global optimisation
- Surrogate modelling
- Expected Improvement
- Upper Confidence Bound optimisation
Example
A Markov model contains four uncertain transition probabilities requiring calibration to observed survival data. Each model evaluation requires 30 minutes of computation.
Bayesian optimisation begins with 20 initial parameter sets, constructs a Gaussian process surrogate model, and uses the Expected Improvement criterion to select subsequent parameter combinations. After 65 total evaluations, the optimal parameter set is identified, whereas an exhaustive grid search would have required several thousand model evaluations.
Excel Implementation
| Function | Example Formula | Health Economics Application |
|---|---|---|
| Solver | Solver Optimisation | Performs local optimisation once candidate solutions have been identified. |
| NORM.DIST | =NORM.DIST(B2,Mean,SD,TRUE) | Evaluates normal distributions used in Gaussian process approximations. |
| INDEX | =INDEX(B2:B100,MATCH(MAX(C2:C100),C2:C100,0)) | Retrieves the best-performing parameter set. |
| MAX | =MAX(C2:C100) | Identifies the current optimum objective value during sequential optimisation. |
VBA (Optional)
Automate iterative parameter evaluation by linking Excel models with external Bayesian optimisation routines and recording successive posterior updates.
Sources
- Rasmussen CE, Williams CKI. Gaussian Processes for Machine Learning. MIT Press.
- Brochu E, Cora VM, de Freitas N. A Tutorial on Bayesian Optimization of Expensive Cost Functions, with Application to Active User Modelling and Hierarchical Reinforcement Learning. University of British Columbia.
- Snoek J, Larochelle H, Adams RP. Practical Bayesian Optimization of Machine Learning Algorithms. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems.
- Briggs A, Claxton K, Sculpher M. Decision Modelling for Health Economic Evaluation. Oxford University Press.
- ISPOR-SMDM Modeling Good Research Practices Task Force reports.
Related Concepts (2)
Library
Publications
1
Conceptualizing a Model: A Report of the ISPOR-SMDM Modeling Good Research Practices Task Force-2 — Roberts, Russell, Paltiel, Chambers, McEwan & Krahn, Task Force Report 2 ed., 2012 (Value in Health / Medical Decision Making)
Best-practice guidance on model conceptualisation — defining the decision problem, scoping, and choosing an appropriate model structure before implementation.
Journal ArticleView source →
Frequently Asked Questions (6)
What is the Bayesian approach in modelling?
A statistical approach updating probability estimates as new evidence arrives, used to combine prior information with observed trial data in modelling.
Source: O'Hagan & Stevens 2001
How does the Bayesian approach differ from frequentist analysis?
The Bayesian approach treats an unknown quantity as having a probability distribution that expresses current belief about it, and revises that distribution as data arrive. A frequentist analysis instead treats the quantity as fixed and unknown and asks how the data would behave under repeated sampling. A practical consequence is that the Bayesian method gives a direct probability that a parameter lies in a range, and readily combines prior evidence with new data, which suits decision-making under uncertainty. Spiegelhalter and colleagues (2004) contrast the two.
Source: Spiegelhalter et al. 2004
How does Bayesian updating work?
Bayesian updating works by starting from a prior probability distribution that expresses existing belief about a quantity, then revising it using observed data according to Bayes's rule to produce a posterior distribution. The posterior combines the prior information with the evidence in the data, weighting each by its precision, so that more or stronger data move the estimate further from the prior. As further evidence arrives, the posterior can be updated again, so estimates are refined coherently as knowledge accumulates.
Source: O'Hagan & Stevens 2001
What is the role of the prior in the Bayesian approach?
The prior in the Bayesian approach represents belief about a quantity before the current data are observed, drawn from previous studies, expert judgement, or general knowledge. It is combined with the data to form the posterior, so that the analysis uses existing information rather than the current data alone. The choice of prior affects the result, especially when data are limited, so priors are stated explicitly and their influence examined. This use of prior information distinguishes Bayesian from purely data-based methods.
Source: O'Hagan & Stevens 2001
Why are Bayesian methods used in health economic modelling?
Bayesian methods are used in health economic modelling because they combine evidence from multiple sources coherently, represent all uncertainty as probability distributions, and update naturally as new data arrive, which suits decision analysis under uncertainty. They allow prior evidence and trial data to be pooled, propagate uncertainty through the model to the results, and connect naturally to the value-of-information analysis used to prioritise research. O'Hagan and Stevens showed how this framework fits the needs of cost-effectiveness analysis from trial data.
Source: O'Hagan & Stevens 2001
What are the limitations of the Bayesian approach?
The Bayesian approach requires specifying prior distributions, which can be subjective and influence results when data are sparse, so the choice of prior must be justified and its effect tested through sensitivity analysis. The computations can be demanding, often requiring simulation methods, and communicating probabilistic results to decision makers can be challenging. Critics also question the use of subjective priors in analyses that inform public decisions. Used carefully, with explicit and examined priors, the approach handles uncertainty coherently, but its assumptions require scrutiny.
Source: O'Hagan & Stevens 2001
Trust Record
Verified by Dr Darrin Baines
British health economist
Professional identity: darrinbaines.org
Verification date: 26 Sep 2025
Content version: 1.0.0
Canonical Identity
- Term code
- HE-EM-DM-003
Stable URI · Machine-readable · Resolvable · CC BY 4.0