Information Asymmetry Scenario Explorer

Explore who holds the informational advantage, when the gap matters, what economic mechanism may follow, and which responses fit the problem.

1. Choose a healthcare scenario

Start with a preset, then change the analytical choices to test how the interpretation changes.

2. Interpretation

    Responses that fit this mechanism

    3. Keep the mechanisms distinct

    Information asymmetry is the underlying information imbalance. The other terms describe particular ways that imbalance may affect decisions.

    MechanismKey questionTypical timingHealthcare example
    Adverse selectionIs a hidden characteristic affecting who enters or which contract is chosen?Before agreementA person knows more than the insurer about expected healthcare needs.
    Moral hazardDoes behaviour change when an action is difficult to observe or its consequences are shared?After agreementUse of care changes after insurance reduces the price paid at the point of use.
    Principal–agent problemHas one party delegated a decision to a better-informed agent with potentially different objectives?During delegated decisionA patient relies on a clinician to recommend care whose necessity is difficult to judge.
    Quality uncertaintyCan the buyer or decision maker assess quality or supporting evidence?Before or after choiceA purchaser cannot fully verify provider quality or a manufacturer’s modelling assumptions.

    How to use the result

    The classification is a structured interpretation of the choices entered, not proof that market failure has occurred. A real assessment must establish which information is consequential, how incentives change, whether behaviour or outcomes are affected, and whether an intervention would improve welfare after its costs and unintended effects are considered.

    More disclosure is not automatically the answer. Information must be credible, relevant and usable, while monitoring, regulation or incentive changes must be proportionate to the problem.